|
Advertisement
|
Disenchanted! Disappointed! Disgusted!
By Tom
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:16 AM CDT
I must say that as a citizen of this country I am disenchanted, disappointed and disgusted by the recent debate over healthcare reform and the behavior of the people of this country and this particular community. I thought people in this country were more mature than they really are, however I am not surprised at the response to many over the healthcare issue. How many people can even explain what the whole care reform would mean to them. I'm not talking about what Rush Limbaugh says it will mean, I'm not talking about what David Vitter says it will mean, I'm not talking about what Bill O'reilly, Michelle Malkin, Glen Beck, Thomas Sowell, Joe Wilson say it will mean. I'm talking about what the President has actually said. The way it is being put forth is that every American will be forced to accept government sponsored healthcare. I never heard the President say that. I did hear him say the government would provide healthcare that would give citizens another, and perhaps cheaper, choice than their current healthcare providers if they so choose to participate. Also, because it is cheaper it might force competing healthcare providers to go down on their price which in turn will make it more affordable to those who continue to use their existing healthcare provider. Nobody will be forced to do anything. I did hear that the government may tell businesses and companies that they must provide healthcare for their employees. If said companies and businesses did this already it would be a non-issue. If I had owned a business I would do everything in my power to see that my employees received some form of healthcare coverage. Not only would it make for happy employees, but it would make for healthier employees meaning less time missed for illness and less money spent towards employees who have to go on disability because they had no access to preventative care. Normally when people start arguing against too much government interference it is usually because they are doing things they shouldn't be doing. Why would the government need to interfere or even want to interfere if people were doing what they were supposed to be doing in treating their fellow citizens with respect in the first place. The federal government gave state and local governments all the time in the world to implement integration during the civil rights movement. Eisenhower and Kennedy only got involved when the violence began to give the U.S. a black-eye in the sight of the world. And just like today there was a public uproar over integration. One of the things that was going around was that integration would mean that young black boys would want to rape young white girls if they went to school together. People today would say that is absurd. Politicians of the day and people who disagreed with integration used this scare tactic to play on people's ignorance to push forward their agenda. You can see how people can twist the truth to spread panic. Unfortunately things don't change and that is scary. Is the Presidents healthcare reform the be all end all to the healthcare problem in this country? Probably not. There will never be a system that will suit or service everyone. You do have to give him credit for at least trying to make good on his campaign promises and even work through bipartisanship even though people are fighting him every step of the way. I've heard everyone say how bad his healthcare reform is going to be, but what I haven't heard from all the venters is a workable alternative. Why don't all the people ranting at town hall meetings and in this forum come up with a healthcare solution that will help a majority of hardworking American citiziens have access to affordable healthcare. I would like to see it. I work for a national retailer that makes sure you work just less than enough hours so you don't receive benefits. Is that fair? What's the solution?
Copyright © 2010 The Daily Iberian
WRITE A COMMENT
Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.
•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated. • Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid. • Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted. • Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

Comments
To all the idiots wrote on Oct 9, 2009 9:31 PM:
time to move on quit sucking on sour grapes. Totally unecessary and stupid talk the joke is on you. "
Jan B. wrote on Oct 3, 2009 9:47 AM:
Nena wrote on Oct 2, 2009 1:11 PM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 30, 2009 1:04 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 30, 2009 6:09 AM:
It's cheaper to pick them up when they go to emergency room and bus them to Mexico!!!! "
DAVID wrote on Sep 29, 2009 11:46 AM:
Chip wrote on Sep 29, 2009 7:46 AM:
Paul Allen wrote on Sep 29, 2009 6:35 AM:
Craig wrote on Sep 28, 2009 11:45 PM:
Po-Doo wrote on Sep 28, 2009 2:05 PM:
clueless wrote on Sep 28, 2009 12:48 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 28, 2009 12:14 PM:
Mmmm,Mmmm,Mmm
Barack Hussein Obama!
Idiots All and his mamma!
Believe anything Obama say!
Down to his very last day!!! "
Outraged wrote on Sep 28, 2009 9:37 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 28, 2009 4:10 AM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 27, 2009 5:11 PM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 27, 2009 4:51 PM:
To the form author Tom wrote on Sep 27, 2009 4:04 PM:
Jan B wrote on Sep 27, 2009 12:54 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 27, 2009 4:39 AM:
Outraged Fan wrote on Sep 26, 2009 7:13 PM:
If you wrote a book, I'd buy it. You my friend have kept me entertained for months now. I honestly don't know which side of the debate you're on, but I don't care. Whether you're serious or pulling people's legs, there is beauty in these gems of your posts in this thread.
Do the world a favor and start publishing! "
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 26, 2009 10:30 AM:
The most fundamental underlying basis of universal health care is the fact that in the system, you don’t have to worry about not being covered.As it stands now, whether or not you're covered and to what extent is determined by a profit-driven industry that is under no obligation to accept anyone, can charge exhorbitant premiums, reduce coverage on a whim and drop you for any arbitrary reason. "
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 26, 2009 9:58 AM:
Main Entry: en·ti·tle·ment
Pronunciation: \-ˈtī-təl-mənt\
2 : a government program providing benefits to members of a specified group (American citizens); also :funds supporting or distributed by such a program.
To Outraged:
Why single out Cuba? Government provided healthcare exist in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, South Korea, the UK and other places. "
DAVID J wrote on Sep 25, 2009 7:44 PM:
PROMOTE the general welfare wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:49 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 24, 2009 7:59 AM:
Pat wrote on Sep 23, 2009 6:26 PM:
"You're correct in saying that health care is NOT a right. It's an entitlement."
Like I said, who are YOU to FORCE someone else to be a doctor? Wake up. A person is "entitled" to that which he earns, not what he can have the government STEAL from others.
I could say that I'm "entitled" to you cutting my grass but that wouldn't make it so. Anyone implying that they are entitled to the fruit of someone Else's labor is WRONG. "
DAVID wrote on Sep 23, 2009 5:09 PM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 23, 2009 5:02 PM:
Jan B. wrote on Sep 23, 2009 4:13 PM:
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 23, 2009 12:57 PM:
Any doctor that accepts insurance is currently subject to the oversight of insurance companies.Nearly all decisions, whether test, prescriptions, surgery, etc...,must be approved by a panel of insurance company overseers.
You're correct in saying that health care is NOT a right. It's an entitlement. Government provides entitlements to its citizens to provide for the common good or as a humanitarian issue.Access to affordable health care should be something afforded to *all* and government has a responsibility to ensure that health care isn't withheld from *any* citizen. "
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 23, 2009 11:36 AM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 23, 2009 9:52 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 23, 2009 7:25 AM:
everyonehasone wrote on Sep 22, 2009 11:37 PM:
Pat wrote on Sep 22, 2009 7:34 PM:
Health care is a commodity, NOT a "right". "
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 22, 2009 5:01 PM:
Who pays for it? I suppose it's the same people that pay for the postal service,emergency services,public roads and general infrastructure,public education,public libraries,NASA,the FDA,Stafford Loans,Temp unemployment benefits,SS,medicaid, medicare,the NOAA,etc...
You haven't driven on our government-subsidized roads, have you?
Utilized the free services provided by the public library?
Mailed a letter using the USPS?
Been forewarned of approaching hurricanes by the NOAA?
etc...
No. Government isn't the solution for everything, but neither is privatization. You criticize the one extreme while pushing the agenda of the other. Sad. "
Jan B. wrote on Sep 22, 2009 4:57 PM:
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 22, 2009 3:38 PM:
You're alluding to a government takeover of health care as in a single payer universal health care system. That's a far cry from the public option being proposed by the president and congress. The hypothetical "slippery slope" argument is just conjecture.
The constitution states that the government is to provide for the general welfare. Social safety nets such as health insurance certainly fits under that directive.
P.S. - Thank you for a sensible and civil reply :) "
Caliguy55 wrote on Sep 22, 2009 3:34 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 22, 2009 8:07 AM:
Agrees wrote on Sep 22, 2009 6:30 AM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 22, 2009 1:01 AM:
Jan B. wrote on Sep 21, 2009 5:00 PM:
To Agrees wrote on Sep 21, 2009 12:52 PM:
Craig wrote on Sep 21, 2009 12:44 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 21, 2009 12:25 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 21, 2009 12:10 PM:
LovingGOPmeltdown wrote on Sep 21, 2009 11:09 AM:
You're an ideal example of the right wing fringe. Nothing more than a loyal devotee to Glenn Beck's rhetoric and conspiratorial hyperbole. To debate with you would be the equivalent of debating a programmed robot. It's pointless. I would argue that half of all bankruptcies list medical bills as the cause and that employer-provided health insurance is straining small businesses. Your counter argument would consist of a one-liner such as "quit drinking the kool-aid". "
Mais Jamais wrote on Sep 21, 2009 10:26 AM:
Wayne wrote on Sep 21, 2009 12:08 AM:
Jim wrote on Sep 20, 2009 9:44 PM:
Tom the anti sugar farmer wrote on Sep 20, 2009 5:42 PM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 20, 2009 11:27 AM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 20, 2009 11:25 AM:
DAVID wrote on Sep 20, 2009 11:15 AM:
Jan B. wrote on Sep 20, 2009 10:58 AM:
Agrees wrote on Sep 20, 2009 7:26 AM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:35 PM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:19 PM:
To Mr. Clean wrote on Sep 19, 2009 3:25 PM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 19, 2009 11:39 AM:
Jan B. wrote on Sep 19, 2009 11:34 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:55 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:49 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 19, 2009 8:43 AM:
MR CLEAN wrote on Sep 19, 2009 4:07 AM:
To To Better Recognize wrote on Sep 19, 2009 2:00 AM:
B/c that's what were were doing the last 8 years? When we tripled the debt, erased our alignments with forgien nations, and increased our global dependency "
To Outraged wrote on Sep 19, 2009 1:51 AM:
Craig contd wrote on Sep 19, 2009 1:10 AM:
Craig wrote on Sep 19, 2009 1:06 AM:
everyonehasone wrote on Sep 18, 2009 9:26 PM:
C.C. wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:43 PM:
There should be a law; if you can't write a coherent sentence, you shouldn't have the right to a computer.(LOL) "
Better Recognize wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:21 PM:
Better Recognize wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:10 PM:
Truth seeker wrote on Sep 18, 2009 5:28 PM:
To beta reconeye wrote on Sep 18, 2009 3:11 PM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 18, 2009 2:53 PM:
idiots all wrote on Sep 18, 2009 2:29 PM:
Love you but look in the mirror wrote on Sep 18, 2009 1:31 PM:
I read the bill wrote on Sep 18, 2009 1:28 PM:
ToTom wrote on Sep 18, 2009 11:19 AM:
PrayerOfFaith wrote on Sep 18, 2009 10:29 AM:
L wrote on Sep 18, 2009 10:02 AM:
Citizen wrote on Sep 18, 2009 9:16 AM:
What I didn't explain in my earlier post is that UMC stands for University Medical Center (LSU Health and Science) is a State Run Hospital which mostly is utilized by patients with no insurance or low income. In other words it is a Charity Hospital. The wealthy family member who is highly respected here ,also was disinchanted with the high cost of Health Care. So if a weathy women who has old money find health care too expensive, than what is the person who makes $18,000.00 a year with 3 kids suppose to do? "
To Better Recognize wrote on Sep 18, 2009 9:08 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 18, 2009 6:50 AM:
Better Recognize wrote on Sep 18, 2009 1:00 AM:
old eagle wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:43 PM:
Pat wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:05 PM:
This should be the basis by which this debate is framed because it is the TRUE basis in the REAL world. Government is not in any way part of solving this problem. Any politician claiming otherwise is lying. "
peter peter wrote on Sep 17, 2009 9:31 PM:
To Tom the DDD wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:53 PM:
Citizen wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:36 PM:
Thank you for that post. You have spoke the truth, but I can bet you that the majority of the people that respond to your post will be the bash and smash Glenn Beck crew. You have heard the same thing I have heard OUR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA say concerning Health Care. I remember going into a well established business a year ago, and one of the daughters of the owner was speaking about going to UMC for her medical needs. Now this is a very wealthy, Country Club family. Now how is that. "
Outraged wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:42 PM:
rightful wrote on Sep 17, 2009 11:02 AM:
Tom wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:43 AM:
Does anyone believe an employer who can only pay slightly above minimum wage can afford insurance for employees? The government will (not may) tell employers they must provide insurance or pay a fined.
However, I believe anything Obama says. I just hope he doesn’t disappoint me like the tooth fairy, Easter bunny and that fat man who is suppose to climb down chimneys. "
Targ wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:09 AM:
C.C. wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:43 AM:
You need to get informed and stop listening to the liberal media. The repubs have a lot of options to Barry's reform. You would never know it by listening to MSM. Barry's not looking out for you. They know if their plan is passed the gov. will have you by the gonads. They are out of options so they place the race card! "
Venter wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:42 AM:
Area Resident wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:15 AM:
Outraged wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:09 AM:
less government more self sufficiency wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:59 AM:
businessman wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:58 AM:
Seems to me that your working for a national chain has failed to educate you
in the area of running a business. If I were to try to give employees healthcare coverage just because the national chains do it, i'd be out of business by monday. Then all 20 of my empoyees would be happier! "
Just Say No wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:53 AM:
everyonehasone wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:26 AM:
not Disenchanted Disappointed Disgusted wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:20 AM: