The result is citizens from across the country and right here in Acadiana expressing their fears about such topics as death panels, a slippery slope toward socialism and rushed Washington reform.
None of those things are true. Like any president before him, President Barack Obama wants his domestic agenda to pass and be supported by a majority of Americans. With that in mind, it would be impossible to sponsor any legislation that has anything remotely tied to a “death panel” or single provider system akin to socialism.
|
Advertisement
|
Such a provision could never be true, if for nothing more than the fact that grandmas vote. It would be political suicide and universally ignorant to create a national system that supported such nonsense. Yet, from small town to small town and big city to big city, people are still expressing those fears.
Why? Maybe they are being supported by the group that stands to lose the most through national health care reform — insurance companies.
Wendell Potter, a former insurance company communications executive, told CNN the insurance industry deliberately spreads false information with the goal of disrupting the debate.
A CNN.com story about health care myths posted last week said the insurance industry hires public relations firms that create front groups to try to “destroy health care reform by using terms like ‘government takeover of the health care system’ or we are heading down a ‘slippery slope toward socialism’ or ‘we’re going to kill your grandpa’ because of these health care regulations,” said Potter, now a senior fellow at the Center for Media and Democracy, which calls itself a nonpartisan watchdog group on public relations spin.
The issue has gotten so twisted in some circles that at many town hall events, the false issue of preventing Obama’s Socialism takeover is being debated instead of the sad state of our current health care system.
The debate, at least in the South, centers not on the 40 million plus Americans sitting without health insurance or the shady insurance company henchmen who now stand in between the insured and proper medical care but on false socialism fears.
Instead of real talk, powerful opinion-makers have shaped the debate from what Americans deserve in health care.
During Vitter’s town hall meeting in Lafayette last week, a man who identified himself as a U.S. veteran thanked the senator for showing his morals and values in fighting health care reform. It’s hard to believe Louisiana’s junior senator has many morals and values to display thanks to his connection with a Washington escort service that has opened a window for porn star Stormy Daniels to consider running against him.
Vitter’s not displaying morals and values. He is simply towing the hard line his national party has adopted in its fight to stem Democratic momentum built up during the last election cycle.
Administration proposals call for creating a government-funded health insurance plan for people who otherwise lack coverage. The previous sentence has nothing to do with socialism, death panels or rushed legislation.
Whether you disagree with the premise or its possibility, make sure not to be a pawn in a Washington power broker sand box game that has been going on for decades.
The American people spoke loudly and decisively in electing their current leadership. Health care reform will be a result of that choice.
STEPHEN HEMELT is city editor of The Daily Iberian. He can be reached at stephen.hemelt@daily-iberian.com.


Comments
Jan B. wrote on Sep 6, 2009 12:08 PM:
L.L. Onjou wrote on Sep 6, 2009 8:23 AM:
Most U.S. doctors support this reform, because health care is a moral and economic issue. Americans deserve better than to be used as cash funnels for corporations until sickness makes us a burden on citizens and our families. "
BAM wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:13 PM:
Dan Rather lied and created false documents about Bush. "
Outraged wrote on Aug 26, 2009 10:44 AM:
Outraged wrote on Aug 26, 2009 8:14 AM:
Jan B wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:00 PM:
BAM wrote on Aug 25, 2009 3:42 PM:
now referred to as Health Insurance Reform. What ever phrase you want to use, it's government take-over. Now we
are not even smart enough to make our own decisions about our health. I know your intent is to get reaction. At this rate
you'll be at the Boston Globe before you
know it. NOT ! "
agree with hemelt wrote on Aug 25, 2009 2:48 PM:
In case those trying to tie you to the stake haven't bothered to check the facts, this debate is NOT about government run health care. What was put forward was a government run public option... similar to the Medicare no one wants to be eradicated. And the AARP itself called the "death panel" allegations nonsense.
Bravo, Stephen Hemelt. "
jg wrote on Aug 25, 2009 2:47 PM:
JG wrote on Aug 25, 2009 2:46 PM:
Stupid Is As Stupid Does wrote on Aug 25, 2009 2:40 PM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:24 PM:
No blood for opium wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:54 AM:
Another ridiculous aspect of this piece is that in an opinion entitled "Health Care Reform Debate Punctuated by Misinformation" somehow Senator Vitter's personal life gets brought up again.
Since Steven went to great lengths to connect the healthcare debate to Senator Vitter's personal life, you would think that he would be talented enough to also connect John Edward's personal life as well, but I guess not. "
Jan B wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:14 AM:
donna wrote on Aug 24, 2009 8:55 PM:
old as dirt wrote on Aug 24, 2009 8:12 PM:
What The Health Care Bill Actually Says. wrote on Aug 24, 2009 3:30 PM:
THE GOVERNMENT DECIDES-
(1) What is an applicable (medical)Condition
(2) Whom is allowed readmission into a Hospital
(3) No Judicial review of decisions made.The Government is above the Courts.
These are a few of the evaluations on the readmissions to hospitals .Hopefully this does not happen to you or your family memebers
HR3200-Pages 284-288,Sec1151 "