Businesses have every right to talk to the state or federal lawmakers who represent their interests just as any person can contact their lawmaker and make a case for their interests, but if AGL is to expand its facility at Lake Peigneur, it will need to give residents of the lake more assurance that its operations are safe.
Atlanta-based AGL Resources is in the energy business and, as any company hopes to do, wants to increase its capacity to earn money. Expanding a businesses can be good for the surrounding community as more jobs are created, some temporary during construction, others more permanent as a larger facility is likely to need a larger staff.
|
Advertisement
|
But there is a responsibility that any company has to, as best they can, be a good neighbor.
Although it is impossible to please everyone, AGL should continue dialogue with residents at Lake Peigneur, letting those folks know what and how they are expanding.
No doubt, the folks who have been monitoring the facility are going to keep up with the company’s permit process.
Sometimes expanding a business is good for the economy, but that should be balanced with the receptiveness of the community it will directly impact.
It should be hoped that both sides try to work with each other to achieve a compromise.
JEFF ZERINGUE
MANAGING EDITOR


Comments
My 2 cents wrote on Aug 19, 2009 10:05 AM:
This money could be used to improve this parish and the State. To recoup the surcharge, AGL can charge the other states, who benefit more from this project, more for the natural gas.
What other state would give AGL, or any other company, a permit to do such a thing in their state? None!!! "
Spoon wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:04 AM:
Louis Derise wrote on Aug 10, 2009 5:05 PM:
First off I am brave enough to put my name behind my opinion.
After the Texaco catastrophe my father supervised the removal
of approximately 6,000 pilings, now AGL wants to scatter these wells
throughout the lake. We were promised from Equitable storage only 2.
When AGL was asked how many, the answer: “many more”, other statements
were “up to 20”. My children water sport frequently in the lake and need no
help from AGL in building a Slalom course! . As I stated earlier this lake has a lot of recreation/tourism value! "
Curious wrote on Aug 7, 2009 9:39 AM:
I've been following this story and I've yet to hear anything specifice from those opposed to the expansion. I think that is why you are accused of having a NIMBY attitude. Can you back up what you say with any examples? Like what makes you think all is not "good"? What has made you believe they put their "greed" before public safety? "
Louis Derise wrote on Aug 3, 2009 6:21 PM:
"OPINIONS WITHOUT NAMES MEAN SQUAT!" " "
Spoon wrote on Aug 3, 2009 10:41 AM:
That's my opinion. "
Louis Derise wrote on Jul 31, 2009 11:01 AM:
if you are willing to listen to their corporate spin produced
by hired public relation consultants who are trained to study
the people and convince them that all is "good". I am sick and tired of
other people telling us what should and should not happen in our back yards.
It is not a case of NIMBY, it is a case of corporate greed and get out of our
way you pesky lake residents. This lake has a lot of potential, don't blow it !
"OPINIONS WITHOUT NAMES MEAN SQUAT!" "