The committee heard from Iberia Parish Sheriff Louis Ackal, Sheriff’s Office attorney Steve Elledge, jail Warden Frank Ellis and other Sheriff’s Office representatives Monday night as they broke down what expenses they found that the parish should have been paying.
The parish pays $760,000 in its current contract with the Sheriff’s Office for the Iberia Parish Jail, a number Ackal and other representatives say is about $500,000 short of the $1.26 million the parish should be paying for jail operations.
|
Advertisement
|
“We’ll need to explain to the public that this number’s not going to cure all the problems out there,” Committee Chairman Bernard Broussard said. “This (payment) might solve some of your short-term problems, but I think we need to look at the bigger picture and see that this might cost us a few million over the next few years.”
Ellis said of the 512 prisoners at the jail, 345 are parish prisoners, 145 are state Department of Corrections prisoners, about 30 come from the city of New Iberia and the rest stem from Abbeville and St. Martin and St. Mary parishes.
Of the 345 parish prisoners, 17 are serving what is considered parish time, which is less than a year, while the other 328 are awaiting trial in the 16th Judicial District, Ellis said.
Ellis said the jail is responsible for 550 meals three times a day, and said the equipment repair budget will not decrease because of the condition of many of the appliances.
“Not an item in that kitchen wasn’t there when the jail first opened,” Ellis said.
Ellis assured committee members that any purchases made at the jail are the most cost-efficient he can find, while Ackal told the committee he has no plans to re-establish a work release program for prisoners.
Committee members Maggie Daniels and Naray Hulin said when polled, residents were against any form of new taxes.
Broussard said it may be necessary to reallocate certain tax revenues to the jail.
“When we put people in jail, the taxpayers are punished, not the prisoners,” Ackal said.
Broussard said after the meeting the $498,000 the Sheriff’s Office is requesting is likely to be agreed upon and will likely be broken down into two, $250,000 payments, but added other problems at the jail also will have to be looked at.
“It’s time to address the facts publicly,” Broussard said. “We can help him in the short-term, but we’ll also need to look at the bigger picture that’s never been addressed.”
Broussard and other committee members asked to have an inventory of all items at the jail for its next committee meeting, tentatively scheduled for July 13.
“We have the numbers, but we’ll give them time to look at it,” Ackal said after the meeting. “We’ll open our books and the jail and let them satisfy what they think needs to be done. We have a council that’s willing to work with us.”


Comments
outside looking in wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:32 AM:
Why is there not a list here of the specific problems and shortfalls? The public has a right to know- "
T-Dud wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:17 AM:
I cannot wait to view Ackal’s audit. I wonder who Ackal will select to do the audit. A reputable firm will not hide the mismanagement by Ackal. "
RICK wrote on Jun 30, 2009 9:05 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on Jun 30, 2009 6:25 PM:
Why don't you make your bookkeeping public? A lot of people want to see where you are spending OUR money. "
WHO is ... wrote on Jun 30, 2009 2:57 PM:
Simple Mathamatics wrote on Jun 30, 2009 2:52 PM:
Do the research wrote on Jun 30, 2009 2:46 PM:
To Sheriff wrote on Jun 30, 2009 1:57 PM: