Senate Bill 317 would prohibit construction and debris landfills from being located within 5,000 feet of an airport serving piston-powered aircrafts, thus applying to Doerle’s landfill and its proximity to the Acadiana Regional Airport.
“I don’t want to go through this again,” Doerle said. “I’ve spent $1 million to put this building up, and when it’ll be done in two weeks, then they put up a bill to stop it.”
|
Advertisement
|
“As a senator, I cannot just sit back and allow one person’s greed to destroy one of the best economic engines that our area has,” said Hebert, D-Jeanerette. “Anyone with common sense can see that a landfill located directly at the end of a runway will severely restrict the Acadiana Regional Airport’s ability to reach its full economic potential.”
Last year’s bill passed in the Legislature and was signed into law by Gov. Bobby Jindal. But the law was ruled unconstitutional by a 19th Judicial District judge who said the population clause made it a local law that only applies to Doerle’s landfill and Iberia Parish.
When Doerle started operating a pickup station and made plans to expand his landfill into Iberia Parish, the Iberia Parish Council initially denied local permits to Doerle because of existing parish solid waste laws and airport ordinances.
Doerle sued the parish and the parish sued back, but the two parties have since reached a settlement allowing Doerle to operate his pickup station as long as he encloses it. The settlement also allows him to expand his landfill into the parish.
Doerle granted servitude to the parish as part of the settlement, and the agreement also states that no local official or local government entity may try to undermine the landfill operations.
“I want to know who’s pushing for this,” Doerle said. “Is it the airport or the Parish Council? If so, they’re breaching the settlement. Either someone’s pushing his buttons or it’s back to a personal vendetta.”
Hebert said he refiled the bill because he received an “overwhelming” amount of responses to a questionnaire he ran in The Daily Iberian in December of last year. Many who responded said they wanted Hebert to attempt to stop the landfill from opening, he said.
“Nobody has yet to explain to me why anything has changed on why a landfill being located at the end of a runway is OK now when there were so many questions on safety and marketability,” Hebert said. “One thing that’s changed is a lot of people have their hands tied and their mouths taped because of the agreements, but mine’s not and I’ll continue to fight for the airport.”
Assistant District Attorney Eric Duplantis, the Parish Council’s legal adviser, said there have been no resolutions passed through the Parish Council or the Airport Authority since the settlement asking Hebert to file the bill.
“Gordon has done everything we’ve asked him to do as far as the settlement,” Duplantis said. “This was something that was litigated, and it wasn’t something that was done lightly. We hammered out an agreement and he’s lived up to his end of the bargain.”
The Federal Aviation Administration has approved the enclosed pickup station, and though Hebert said the FAA does not yet approve of the landfill, Airport Director Jason Devillier said he believes the FAA will approve of the landfill as long as the pickup station is enclosed.
Hebert has invited the FAA to visit the airport to examine the situation, he said, adding companies located at the airport have spoken with him at length about the negative impact the landfill would have on airport operations.
Doerle said he will file lawsuits against the state, the state Department of Environmental Quality, the parish and the airport if the bill passes.
“I’ve more than lived up to my side of the agreement,” Doerle said. “I’ve invested too much into this for them to start playing games.”



Comments
George M. Sfeir wrote on Sep 24, 2009 1:40 AM:
ARA resident wrote on Jun 10, 2009 6:54 PM:
When was the last time you had construction debris picked up from your home and sent to the DUMP.....That is suppose to be the only trash at the DUMP...but if it were there would not be such an awful smell that comes from his ponds that attracts all the birds..open your eyes and nose before you speak...
THE DUMP has over 6 pages of violations from DEQ and still it remains open...NOW THAT SMELLS FISHY TO ME...especially when Haney, Romero and Freyou are traveling to Baton Rouge to speak FOR the DUMP.... "
To Citizen wrote on Jun 7, 2009 6:56 PM:
Citizen wrote on Jun 7, 2009 11:33 AM:
LNS wrote on Jun 3, 2009 12:21 PM:
to mboutte wrote on Jun 2, 2009 3:18 PM:
Mike wrote on Jun 2, 2009 2:25 PM:
catchme wrote on Jun 2, 2009 1:47 PM:
Laughing Wondering wrote on Jun 2, 2009 10:28 AM:
To D Hertz wrote on Jun 2, 2009 6:20 AM:
D. Hertz wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:46 PM:
Let me guess you grew up in New Iberia and don't get out much. "
Got Your Back wrote on Jun 1, 2009 8:37 PM:
You have alot of nerve talking about us who do not use our name. What is yours? Should I say anymore? Airlog is good to my son and all the people that work there you moron. They pay more taxes than Doyle and also employ more people. Who wants to fly over trash? You??????????????? "
sky king wrote on Jun 1, 2009 7:54 PM:
The ARA airport is only limited by the limits of the local management's perception !
If airport management thinks bigger, bigger things are possible.
This analyst sees a positive shift in aircraft possibilites at ARA with the new nearly all aircraft credentialed board.
Airline service to ARA is indeed possible provided the airport managers focus on things aircraft and hold themselves above being manipulated for hillbilly politics and the preservation of cronyism!
Go you magnificent 7 ! "
angle wrote on Jun 1, 2009 1:13 PM:
To D Hertz wrote on May 31, 2009 11:12 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 31, 2009 3:20 PM:
We airport supporters have let the corrupt parish officials define this argument as a local argument only, putting Gordon Doerle out as their poster child.
This is a call on the airport supporters to take control over the argument and began focussing on the statewide effects that this law will have, that is to improve safety at airports around the whole State of Louisiana.
Louisiana needs airport safety zoning. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 31, 2009 3:49 AM:
You make excellent points. It is just hard to believe that the powers that be in Louisiana could actually get it right.
Louisiana always seems to be last on all the good lists and first on all the bad lists. If this bill passes, it will be refreshing to see. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 30, 2009 2:01 PM:
See if you can turn this into a racial issue. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 30, 2009 2:00 PM:
Why don't YOU use your name? What a joke.
And to think that you have made a fair analysis of the hazards to aviation caused by the landfill by driving by the landfill and looking at it from the front seat of your pickup is a bigger joke. "
Concerned Citizen wrote on May 30, 2009 11:56 AM:
And just how does your not smelling the landfill, or seeing any birds, have to do with the passage of SB-317, which addresses the safety issues of airfields in our State? The measure before the State Legislature is not some vendetta agains some singular little landfill in our area. The purpose of SB-317 addresses a Statewide issue. Seems to me your comment, as well as others, support the very self-interest groups (Parish Officials) that are trying so desperately to defeat a "Bill" that serves the greater populas of Louisians, and not local pocket-books. "
mboutte wrote on May 30, 2009 9:55 AM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 30, 2009 6:34 AM:
ARA is perfectly suited for an airline like Southwest who would make one flight to Houston per day or three days per week. Other low cost/discount airlines may prefer a set up at Iberia.
You know there is life beyond Continental, Delta and American. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 30, 2009 6:23 AM:
Iberia people have notoriosly lacked vision. We love to hang on to this wink-and-nod, under-the-table deals, and corrupt politician mentality.
For once the persons who can see the future have arisen, and the political machine has tried to squelch them.
We need to get rid of this slate of polticians next election. "
JJ wrote on May 29, 2009 4:13 PM:
sky king wrote on May 29, 2009 3:23 PM:
The Parish's efforts to make a band-aid, after-the-fact, stand in local aircraft zoning law (i.e. the landfill suits settlement) is indeed a joke.
For one thing it does nothing for the other end of the airport.
It also does nothing to protect the Jeanerette airport, and nothing for the airports in the other 63 Parishes.
We need S.B. 317 to make it all the way to state law.
Lastly, airplanes and helilcopters did not tear up Highway 88, dump trucks and garbage trucks did. "
Got Your Back wrote on May 28, 2009 9:33 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 28, 2009 8:30 PM:
Don't listen to that poppycock about some contract with a service tude. What makes anyone think that the Parish government will make Mr. Doerle do anything thats written in the contract? The Parish will just wink and nod at all the coming violations of the contract and there won't be a _______ thing we will be able to do about it.
March on Troy Hebert, protect us from these idiots. "
c. bourque wrote on May 28, 2009 5:50 PM:
ARA resident wrote on May 28, 2009 2:35 PM:
Perhaps you need to put on your eyeglasses when you drive by THE DUMP....There are plenty of birds...perhaps it is the foul smell from the water in those ponds; I do not really know what they are attracted to....maybe there could be something else in that DUMP besides what we all know of...But there are birds...And it smells awful....is that debris from construction sites that smells so awful??? maybe someone needs to take a closer look..THE DUMP could be moved away from the runway and away from neighboring family homes that have been here for generations........ "
coteau resident wrote on May 28, 2009 11:33 AM:
sky king wrote on May 28, 2009 7:33 AM:
Birds over the airport property are of course a concern to aircraft operations. However the much larger concern is birds on the approach and departure ends of the runway in which airplanes would have much higher impact speeds.
If you did not know it, there are looming plans to massively expand the landfill operation.
At some point in the future, a softer political environment at DEQ might grant a garbage variance instead of construction debris.
Hence S.B.317 which prescribes spacing between landfills and airports for all 64 Parishes. "
OhTheBirds wrote on May 28, 2009 12:07 AM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 27, 2009 4:50 PM:
To sky king: I appreciate your correcting me with professionalism. I do not have a copy of the bill. I'm just going by what Senator Hebert said in a recent article, that this will only effect-one-landfill. "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 27, 2009 4:37 PM:
As for the thinking big, I seriously doubt that if the landfill is moved that we will still see the items you've listed happen here at ARA when they are but 20 miles away. How many of these contracts have we lost due to the landfill? "
D. Hertz wrote on May 27, 2009 2:03 PM:
Your comments amount to nothing more than buffoonery.
Think big for a change, you know, aircraft complex with airline service, commuter air service, trams to bring all the people around, rental car stations, terminal building with overpriced coffee, etc. "
sky king wrote on May 27, 2009 12:54 PM:
So far as I know, there are no singular provisions in S.B. 317 intended to be harmful only to Doerle's individual operations.
I'll try to get a copy of it myself, just to make sure. "
To Frank Rizzo wrote on May 27, 2009 12:41 PM:
Why should citizens, business owners @ ARA have to pay the price for Mr. Doerle's poor choices? He should have remained @ his first location, next to SugArena.
Enough with your personal vendetta against Senator Hebert!
Bravo Senator!!! "
Doerle brought this on himself wrote on May 27, 2009 12:12 PM:
THANK YOU TROY! KEEP UP THE FIGHT! "
ARA resident wrote on May 27, 2009 9:22 AM:
It seems like such common sense....to those who possess COMMON SENSE.... "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 27, 2009 9:04 AM:
sky king wrote on May 27, 2009 7:09 AM:
One is either for or against the minimum spacing.
Landfills are not outlawed in this bill, on spacing or re-spacing is required.
This bill is not about who rates or does not rate in the universe.
Be nice people. We need airports and we need lanfills.
One could operate a brothel next door to a church but both entities would suffer.
Space them apart and they both thrive. "
Dangerous wrote on May 26, 2009 11:22 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 26, 2009 8:25 PM:
To risk all of this activity to pad the pockets of one trash pile owner and his political cronies makes no sense.
Welcome to the Banana Republic of Iberia Parish. "
ARA resident wrote on May 26, 2009 4:51 PM:
If all you are doing is paying taxes and not making a profit....why do you stay...is it because maybe you yourself has something to do with Doerle's....maybe ...sure makes one wonder..
I agree...let D.Hertz take on the contract to get rid of our garbage without putting any of us in harm's way....Why is it that there must always be some sort of tragic end to something like this before people open their eyes.....
THANK YOU SENATOR TROY HEBERT "
Angle wrote on May 26, 2009 3:03 PM:
angle wrote on May 26, 2009 2:58 PM:
Reule Brousssard wrote on May 26, 2009 2:00 PM:
ARA resident wrote on May 26, 2009 11:01 AM:
This should say it all............
Why all the fuss to keep something so dangerous....
Move it......... "
concerned ARA resident wrote on May 26, 2009 10:57 AM:
Just four months after a run-in with birds sent a jet full of people into the Hudson River separating New York and New Jersey.Of all the places to put it, why direct deadline center at the end of a runway?" "
D. Hertz wrote on May 26, 2009 8:19 AM:
I would gladly take over the contract, build a landfill in some remote location, or dispose of the trash in other ways, and reap the millions of dollars in government funds doing so.
And I am sure we could find many a person to do it. "
Reule Broussard wrote on May 25, 2009 9:45 PM:
When will these local yocals get it right? This is pathetic!
How in the _____ will we ever be proud of this community/ "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 25, 2009 3:07 PM:
Does anybody know? Can you list them here for us to see? "
Thankful to Gordon wrote on May 25, 2009 1:09 PM:
Picks up our trash weekly so that it does not pile up in our yards for weeks and months at a time.
Thank you Gordon! "
angle wrote on May 25, 2009 11:04 AM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 24, 2009 8:52 PM:
Air Logistics, AvEx, Pelican Aviation, Bristow Academy, B.P. Oil, several corporations base corporate aircraft in New Iberia, twenty four aircraft owners who have purchased hangars
Business development at the trash pile:
Gordon Doerle's wallet. "
Angle wrote on May 24, 2009 7:05 PM:
dreamcatcher wrote on May 24, 2009 6:46 PM:
ARA resident wrote on May 24, 2009 2:07 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 24, 2009 7:22 AM:
We should pay NO attention to the development of the aircraft complex because there are a few that have a love for landfills. We should do everything we can to destroy one asset that our parish has that we can be proud of.
Is is just Iberia or are other people around this nation that stupid? "
Angle wrote on May 23, 2009 6:30 PM:
save our airport wrote on May 23, 2009 12:42 AM:
ARA resident wrote on May 23, 2009 12:40 AM:
To Angle wrote on May 23, 2009 12:32 AM:
ARA resident wrote on May 23, 2009 12:26 AM:
I sure hope you were referring to all the jobs that will be lost if we do not continue to fight for our airport and all and jobs that could depend on it and not THE DUMP....We have one the best...if not the BEST landing strips in the state...why would we even consider letting THE DUMP staying where it is and not being able to even try to bring in bigger and better to our airport...Let's be known for our huge DUMP....it appears to project more quality jobs than an airport... "
Angle wrote on May 22, 2009 3:54 PM:
Drean Big wrote on May 22, 2009 3:50 PM:
sky king wrote on May 22, 2009 1:09 PM:
Historically ARA management set back and let aircraft buiness recruiting run on "automatic".
Hopefully the stronger airport board now in place and the recent manager change will bring a re-think on aircraft business recruitment.
One recent plus sign here is ARA has a new web-site in the making, looks like things are changing in the right way! "
D. Hertz wrote on May 22, 2009 8:49 AM:
The reason that ARA has not acquired contracts as you discussed is that the management of ARA has not been pro-active in pursuing those contracts.
Those kind of deals do not come begging. An effective airport management team must go after that kind of stuff.
I think with the passage of SB317, we have taken a large step in changing the pattern of neglect of ARA. Hopefully SB317 will usher in greater things. "
RCNo wrote on May 21, 2009 10:31 PM:
sick and tired of THE DUMP wrote on May 21, 2009 10:07 PM:
Thanks, Senator Hebert....we are behind you all the way and will continue to be........
Save our airways..we will need them "
to pile on ol Rizzo wrote on May 21, 2009 10:04 PM:
Case closed! "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 21, 2009 1:07 PM:
red baron wrote on May 21, 2009 12:30 PM:
You seem to forget the issues at hand; Landfill operations in the vicinity of airports in 64 Louisiana Parishes. Not how rotten this or that individual is.
From your postings I have to doubt that you are literate in subjects outside the aircraft industries, of which you indeed profess to being illiterate.
Why don't you check out some books on scientific thinking and deductive reasoning, then you can be a more effective poster.
But since you seem to like a good fight "
Fact Is wrote on May 21, 2009 11:13 AM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 21, 2009 9:56 AM:
To Frank Rizzo wrote on May 21, 2009 9:33 AM:
Senator Hebert voted "no" for the pay increase; stop grasping for straws. I recommend you take the advice from "sky king."
You have never accepted the fact that Senator Hebert is here to stay and there isn't anything anyone can say to change your mind...so move on with your personal vendetta and start gardening, that-is,-if-you-can-comprehend!--Laugh-out-louder!!!! "
To sky king wrote on May 21, 2009 9:14 AM:
sky king wrote on May 21, 2009 8:18 AM:
Last time I checked, Senator Hebert does not have a Ferrari, and lives in a rather common house. Perhaps you have access to Senator Hebert's bank account information? You are the most unscientific poster in this forum.
I reject your notion that any elected official in support of the Louisiana aircraft interests is automatically up to no good.
Whereas I assume you have no aircraft credentials and are therefore aircraft illiterate, why don't you take up gardening or something you can better comprehend? "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 20, 2009 10:45 PM:
Laugh out loud! "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 20, 2009 10:38 PM:
Joe the plumber wrote on May 20, 2009 8:29 PM:
To D. Hertz wrote on May 19, 2009 6:48 PM:
To Frank Rizzo wrote on May 19, 2009 6:37 PM:
You appear very ignorant and foolish with your outlandish accusations...but you apparently answered your own question....."with a handshake." Laugh out loud!
This fight is about "quality of life," "safety" and "economic growth" not personalities!! Could you please let that sink in your noggin? Geez! "
Willam Gee wrote on May 19, 2009 4:29 PM:
will be dumping on your property soon wrote on May 19, 2009 3:58 PM:
Harold Plaisance wrote on May 19, 2009 2:24 PM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 18, 2009 8:24 PM:
Whuuuuuuuuuuu ! ! ! Yeeeaaaahhhh ! ! !
Its about time this pattern of corruption changes.
Take that Phil Haney.
Many thanks to Senator Troy Hebert for standing up to the total nonsense of our so called local leaders.
Keep up the good work Senator Troy Hebert. "
sky king wrote on May 18, 2009 7:11 PM:
Looks like the Louisiana Legislature and the Louisiana aircraft industries are not gonna let the tail wag the dog after all!
Apparently the rest of the state doesn't agree the sorry local patch job airport zoning model put out by Iberia Parish is aircraft proper!
Good work to Mr. Hebert and the aircraft interests in Louisiana! "
Harold Plaisance wrote on May 18, 2009 2:35 PM:
What do I tell my grandchildren as they are coming up?
We had the chance to preserve a transportation terminal but couldn't because one man needed to keep getting rich with a trash pile business, and that's the way it is in these parts, etc.
So you best move out of this area and make something of yourself, lest you get caught up in the same backstabbing type political games.
Go west young man, go west.
Yes sir grandpa. "
Fly guy wrote on May 18, 2009 2:13 PM:
I've flown in an out of many airports across the country and had some close calls with wildlife in the air (birds). Why would anyone do things to encourage wildlife to exist near an airport?
Imagine that, tuning in to New Iberia to see what's up and seeing them trying to destroy the biggest asset they have, ARA.
You will never get an airline intersted in ARA. "
Reule Brousssard wrote on May 18, 2009 1:29 PM:
Why can't our elected people just do the riight thing? Even with the little education I have, I can figure that putting a landfill next to an airport is a bad idea.
Do these elected people have to go to some kind of classes to hold office? If not they should. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 18, 2009 10:08 AM:
The airport is fine with it because according to Sky King's post from the other thread, the airport members were under a gag order fromi Phil Haney himself, not to speak about the bill whatsoever.
Why would Phil Haney do this? Why have an airport board. It should be renamed to:
"Iberia Parish Airport Lack of Authority" "
D. Hertz wrote on May 17, 2009 9:44 PM:
This is beginning to stink the high heaven.
And by the way, where does our so-called state representatives Simone Champagne and Taylor Barras stand on all of this? Will they also jump on the landfill train? "
Reule Broussard wrote on May 17, 2009 8:55 PM:
Where is the money and who is benefitting from money by the local officials opposing the airport?
Mr. Doyle is of course. But why this passionate "stand by my man" attitude of the local politicians?
Like daddy said follow the money. "
William Gee wrote on May 17, 2009 2:01 PM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 17, 2009 11:28 AM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 17, 2009 11:21 AM:
sky king wrote on May 17, 2009 11:07 AM:
Senator Hebert's Senate Bill 317 is a statewide airport zoning bill that will protect the other 63 Louisiana Parishes from ever having to pitch a costly undending fight like of the one in Iberia Parish.
All of the aircraft experts at the S.B. 317 hearing testified for the bill and against the notion of landfills in the immediate vicinity of airports.
Good job, Mr. Hebert! "
D. Hertz wrote on May 17, 2009 12:38 AM:
Its crazy to think that these arrogant local officials should have been consulted before Senator Troy Hebert crafted a law which helps out airport development around the whole state. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 16, 2009 6:03 PM:
Keep pressing on Troy Hebert. The only naysayers are the ones trying to profit off of the landfill. "
Annoyed wrote on May 16, 2009 1:43 PM:
Annoyed wrote on May 16, 2009 1:40 PM:
Thats all for now- "
To Frank Rizzo wrote on May 15, 2009 9:40 PM:
So Frank, you are calling the businesses @ the airport and all the people who are in opposition liars with a personal vendetta? Appears you are the one with a personal vendetta against Senator-Hebert. "
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 15, 2009 5:12 PM:
I just drove by the airport form watching the air show practices, guess what, no birds, no accidents. I don't care where you try to put a landfill, there will always be people who will have a reason for not putting it in that particular location. This time everybody is using the excuse of the airport, when all it really is, is politics & personal vendettas. "
LLTB wrote on May 15, 2009 2:40 PM:
To LLTB wrote on May 15, 2009 1:10 PM:
Rebel wrote on May 14, 2009 10:29 PM:
redneck-1 wrote on May 14, 2009 10:21 PM:
Do you realy think it;s just construction debris think again i have been there many times you don't have a clue. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 14, 2009 6:14 PM:
Of course we need landfills. I don't think Mr. Doerle is some big hero for operating a "construction debris and yardwaste" landfill. If he didn't do it, I am sure we would find someone else to volunteer to operate a facility which generates millions of dollars and makes its owner wealthy.
And probably we could find a person who wouldn't put the landfill at the end of an airport runway.
Oh yeah, and strike it rich when there is a hurricane. "
LLTB wrote on May 14, 2009 12:45 PM:
landfill support wrote on May 14, 2009 11:25 AM:
looney toones wrote on May 14, 2009 10:58 AM:
dreamcatcher wrote on May 14, 2009 12:40 AM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 13, 2009 9:22 PM:
The answer to where does Doerle put his trash pile, is somewhere that doesn't interfere with public safety.
I don't feel the least bit of sympathy for the plight of Mr. Doerle. He has made millions off of the Parish in hurricane cleanup and he is trying to pad his pockets some more to the detriment of our aviation investment.
Put your trash pile elsewhere. Why does he HAVE to have the trash pile at the end of our runway? "
just me wrote on May 13, 2009 4:30 PM:
To Frank Rizzo wrote on May 13, 2009 12:11 PM:
To D. Hertz wrote on May 13, 2009 11:08 AM:
D. Hertz wrote on May 13, 2009 8:56 AM:
Maybe my comments were a little harsh. I guess we all get a bit haphazard with the keyboard when we post. My apologies to you.
It seems we are on the same side here. The establishment of the trash pile, which is a real threat to the neighbors, a hazard to everyone using the airport and around the airport only benefits the pocketbook of one man. What sense is that?
Doesn't Mr. Doerle make enough money on his food business? "
Big Picture wrote on May 13, 2009 7:57 AM:
Frank Rizzo wrote on May 13, 2009 6:41 AM:
As long as we have our airport, who needs to have a trash pile right? It's going to get awfully smelly around here! "
redneck-1 wrote on May 12, 2009 8:51 PM:
Where do you live ,would like a trash pile in your back yard think not and as for you D. Hertzq you would not know english if it bit you in the rear end read your own words. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 12, 2009 8:21 PM:
dreamcatcher wrote on May 12, 2009 4:07 PM:
To Mr. Lou wrote on May 12, 2009 3:28 PM:
Eminant Domain. Call it what it is...Communist. "
Expatriate wrote on May 12, 2009 3:19 PM:
Mr Lou wrote on May 12, 2009 2:54 PM:
My thanks go out to Sen Hebert for having the vision and foresight to understand how important ARA is. Keep up the good fight. "
D. Hertzq wrote on May 12, 2009 8:11 AM:
What? Would you please post your comments in English? "
D. Hertz wrote on May 12, 2009 8:11 AM:
At our airport, we have the largest planes flying, landing here to get serviced. We have the military jets coming in for fuel. We have multiple helicopter companies which service the offshore industry. We have a great flock of ordinary people in general aviation.
Why would we allow such a great hazard, which only benefits one man, to exist on the end of a runway to jeopardize all of this? "
catchme wrote on May 11, 2009 9:36 PM:
Maurice Bart wrote on May 11, 2009 1:24 PM:
Sir could you please tell the courtroom if there is indeed a redneck2? The public needs to know.
Also, how would one close junk on Hwy-182? Are we humanly able to "close junk?" How does one "close junk?"
I am utterly perplexed and mystified by your intentions. "
redneck-1 wrote on May 10, 2009 8:33 PM:
Ward Bodin wrote on May 10, 2009 6:05 PM:
Thanks Sen. Hebert for standing up for
those who know right from wrong. "
D. Hertz wrote on May 10, 2009 5:36 PM:
We should seek to INCREASE the business and activity at the airport, not resolve ourselves to the the theory that it is not worth it. We have a great aviation facility and should stive to protect it.
Gordon, go dump somewhere else. "
not happy wrote on May 9, 2009 10:46 PM:
Interesting wrote on May 8, 2009 10:15 AM:
To Rebel wrote on May 8, 2009 9:24 AM:
Very Naive wrote on May 8, 2009 8:56 AM:
It seems ironic when speaking of "greed" because citzens have been fighting this for years & because of the previous senator nothing happened. Matter of fact, the former senator has been contacting B.R. on a daily basis for Mr. Doerle. How much is that costing Mr.
Doerle?
Thanks Senator Hebert for standing up-for-the-"little-people"-and-taking-all-the-personal-attacks-from-Mr.-Doerle-etcetera. "
Rebel wrote on May 8, 2009 7:04 AM:
Quit saying you are for the airport when you just dont want a dump in your yard!
I would trade property with you, a project is being built next to my property, I would rather a dump than the projects. "
frighten area resident wrote on May 8, 2009 12:46 AM:
We will all benefit more from the expandtion of our airport that we are so fortunate to have instead of this filthy DUMP...
Thanks Again Mr. Troy Hebert. "
David Paul Faulk wrote on May 7, 2009 7:23 PM:
Frank wrote on May 7, 2009 3:25 PM:
Always Right wrote on May 7, 2009 3:23 PM:
Mr. Doerle is living the American Dream...Capitalism. He is investing his money, and sweat to participate in the free market. There are laws that protect Mr. Doerle. Stop writing legislation that targets one person. You look like a fool.
If you want Mr. Doerle's business shut down, then do it the right way...write him a check. I'm sure he has a price.
Down with socialism! "
Mike wrote on May 7, 2009 2:46 PM:
Citizen wrote on May 7, 2009 1:54 PM:
Doyano wrote on May 7, 2009 1:19 PM:
Dreamcatcher-- Where were you when GORDONS was farming their 100 acres? "
Airport User wrote on May 7, 2009 12:58 PM:
Berry Bruddah wrote on May 7, 2009 11:38 AM:
Slim wrote on May 7, 2009 11:08 AM:
Ted wrote on May 7, 2009 8:27 AM:
CPL wrote on May 7, 2009 7:01 AM:
Let this dead horse rest in peace.
Word of advice to Gordon,.. just don't break the ration plane for the landing system. "
dreamcatcher wrote on May 7, 2009 12:37 AM:
G wrote on May 6, 2009 9:47 PM:
G wrote on May 6, 2009 9:44 PM:
Don Corleon wrote on May 6, 2009 8:28 PM:
ARA resident wrote on May 6, 2009 6:36 PM:
AGAIN........THANKS MR. HEBERT....FOR CARING...IT WILL BE REMEMBERED........ "
ETEE wrote on May 6, 2009 6:26 PM:
Jarred James Breaux wrote on May 6, 2009 3:57 PM:
Mike wrote on May 6, 2009 3:33 PM:
ARA area resident wrote on May 6, 2009 3:11 PM:
sputnik wrote on May 6, 2009 2:40 PM:
taxpayer wrote on May 6, 2009 2:24 PM:
Bubba Dump wrote on May 6, 2009 2:20 PM:
I agree wG.D. wrote on May 6, 2009 2:17 PM:
Doerle said he will file lawsuits against the state, the state Department of Environmental Quality, the parish and the airport if the bill passes.
“I’ve more than lived up to my side of the agreement,” Doerle said. “I’ve invested too much into this for them to start playing games.” "
HipHop Narray wrote on May 6, 2009 2:15 PM:
Bruce Fooze wrote on May 6, 2009 2:13 PM:
Narrator Hulan wrote on May 6, 2009 2:12 PM: