Help Out IPSO

By: Concerned For Deputies
Published/Last Modified on Friday, May 1, 2009 5:11 AM CDT

 

I am writing this post in reference to Sheriff Ackal’s proposed increase in the city budget. I hear a lot of people complaining that the Sheriff spent all sorts of money on cars, etc., and now he is asking for more than a million dollars increase for the budget for enforcement services in the city of New Iberia. Well, let me enlighten y’all to a few things here:

Sheriff Ackal did spend quite a bit of money on cars. Those cars are meant for patrolling the city of New Iberia. If he had not spend that money, he would have his deputies patrolling in vehicles that were used and abused, with more than 200,000 miles (which are the GOOD ones), and these old cars would be putting all of the IPSO deputies in danger. People complain about response times, but how do you expect a patrol unit to respond in a quick and efficient manner when they are driving clunkers? These cars are brand new, and equipped to handle the job at hand, so in my opinion, it was a great purchase. Buying used state police cars is not the answer!

Advertisement
Second, people complain that the city is paying the Sheriff more than enough money to provide its service to the city. Well, let’s do some math here. The original NIPD (before the contract), ran on a budget of around 4.8 million dollars. When the old administration signed the contract, they said that they could provide the same service on a budget of only 3.4 million! I’m no mathematician, but I can tell you that it is impossible to run the same enforcement services for almost 1.5 million less!! In fact, if you don’t believe me, look at how the enforcement services were handled from the time the contract was signed, until July 1, 2008. Detectives were pulled off of their assignments to work patrol, response times were lacking…at best, crime was up, there was no traffic division…the list goes on.

Now, the Sheriff has boosted up detectives, manpower on patrol (there are 15 per shift for the city alone), there is an entire traffic division, response times are on average of 2 minutes, and crime certainly has gone down! However, the Sheriff is forced to provide this service at his own cost. The city is paying what the contract calls for, but this is nowhere near enough money to continue this kind of enforcement services in the city of New Iberia. The question I have is if the city needed more money to fund NIPD Enforcement, why do they think the Sheriff can do the same…or better, on so much less money!? All Sheriff Ackal is asking is for the money that it costs…nothing extra.

If you aren’t convinced that the Sheriff’s Department needs the increase that the Sheriff is requested…then let’s do some comparison shopping:

New Iberia (City): Population 32,910; Employees (City only) 100+; Budget: 3.4 million

Opelousas (City): Population 22,860; Employees (City) 100; Budget: 5 million

Slidell (City): Population 25,695; Employees (City) 119; Budget: 8.4 million

Houma (City): Population 32,393; Employees (City) 102; Budget: 8.6 million

Alexandria (City): Population 46,342; Employees (City) 202; Budget: 17.6 million

Bossier (City): Population 54,461; Employees (City) 259; Budget: Almost 18 million

What I am asking for you all to do is consider this and call your local city council person and tell them that you want the same great service that is being provided for you now, and you want them to approve the increase, so that some of these services suffer. Sheriff Ackal is not asking for a tax to be passed, he is not asking for a surplus of money…all he is asking for is the money that it costs to effectively enforce the city of New Iberia. Please give this some consideration and call your local council person.

Thanks!

Comments

    To To Enlighten wrote on May 20, 2009 1:00 PM:

    " Newsflash: Former AG Foti, a very, very, close personal friend of former Sheriff Sid Hebert helped draft the contract. Obviously, AG Caldwell has the experience and knowledge to opine the contract "null & void." Yes, the final decision lies with the court. I do remember the people voted on this issue but, I also remember what false premise the former sheriff used. "

    Gordon wrote on May 17, 2009 7:54 AM:

    " In response to the "cut back" statement in tough times. This has to be the most ignorant statement made in here besides the normal complaints by the "know it all's". So I when something happens to your or your loved ones you will understand because "someone" had to cut back operating costs. In case you have lived in a cave, or New Iberia EVERYTHING has gone up in expense, and Law Enforcement is no exception. Everybody wants more, but DOESNT want to pay for it. The American way, what a joke. "

    To outside looking in wrote on May 16, 2009 7:23 PM:

    " Don't be fooled, Freddie, Hilda and Ackal are very good buddies. This act they done for the public over the rising costs of policing, is just that, an act. "

    outside looking in wrote on May 16, 2009 12:38 PM:

    " Thsi is typical NI----Louis Ackal is doing more with less than most cities this size in La. Certain people cant have their way (ie Freddy Decout and his cronies)
    Boo Hoo Hoo "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 15, 2009 11:26 AM:

    " To HUMMMMMMM
    I cannot believe that people like you want to begrudge the very ones who will help you when you need help. Open your eyes and see the Sheriff's Dept patroling within the city and parish.Think it comes free? The only other question I have for you is-What tree did you fall out of? Or What turnip truck you fell off of!!! People like started telling Mr Ackal how and what to do not even a month after he was in office. Run for Sheriff you know nothing thinks they know it all! "

    HMMMMMM.... wrote on May 15, 2009 10:37 AM:

    " So, what happens if he gets the additional monies and then he decides he still needs more money? We are just going to keep giving it to him? Most of us are all struggling right now. When that happens, we CUT BACK! I still say he should not have purchased all the new equipment, materials, vehicles and high-dollar personnel until he became more familiar with the whole working enviroment of the department. If i get a new job i am not going out and buying out the stores until I get settled into the position. "

    To Enlighten wrote on May 15, 2009 10:14 AM:

    " Get your facts straight! AG Caldwell, a close personal friend of Louis, said in his "opinion" the contract should be null and void. The actual desolution of the contract will have to go to court. Remember, the citizens VOTED it in! "

    WHATWHAT wrote on May 15, 2009 1:59 AM:

    " Hey,ya know every one of you should wright a book on how to be a Sheriff.Until you start backing what you voted in and till you start backing your officers you will get what you get.Get over it there is only one judge and you all know who it is .Come together Iberia we have to be thankful for what we have to keep us safe,if we have an emergency who do we call who responds to us when we need help our local police department.Get over it next time you see an officer or the Sheriff say thanks. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 10, 2009 7:43 AM:

    " To Just Me
    All those complaining about Mr Ackal should form their own law enforcement. Problem is they would complain so much they would never leave the parking lot!!! The City is getting a great deal for the little money they are paying and they know it. Mr Ackal is doing a great job and I see it. Everywhere I go I see patrol cars patroling. Never saw that before!!! And as for the money spent on new cars I am overy joyed!!! They were much needed and so was a new phone system.Wise move Sheriff Ackal. "

    Just Me 2 wrote on May 10, 2009 2:25 AM:

    " I just wanted to thank the deputies that served our commumity just the other night. These guys were very professional and caught a guy in the act of stealing. Call it being in the right place at the right time. These two deputies acted fast and there was no glitz and glamour or hipe. I agree with Just me. These guys are doing thier job and if I could fund them I would. I like seeing more SO presence in my area. I appreciate your hard and often unrecognized work guys. "

    JustMe wrote on May 9, 2009 12:10 AM:

    " If Sid Hebert wouldnt have gotten into that BOGUS contract, we wouldnt be in this mess in the first place. Evidentally the people on here complaining about Ackal dont use the police for anything, maybe they should just police themselves if they dont like it. I live in a rural subdivision outside of the city limits and about 3 times a month theres a patrol car in here just looking around DOING HIS JOB! I APPRECIATE that and if it takes more $ to keep it up then so be it. I LOVE LOUIS ACKAL! KEEP UP THE GOODWORK! "

    US Veteran wrote on May 8, 2009 12:21 PM:

    " Sheriff Ackal is a better sheriff that Sid was. Sid was only worried about looking good for the camera in front of him. And it seemed like where ever a camera was around, Sid was circling it like a vulture on a carcass. The only thing he didn't have was a person carrying a full sized mirror. Ackal is doing a good job and could careless about cameras. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 7, 2009 3:32 PM:

    " Thank you Mayor Hilda Curry and City Counsel for recognizing Mr Ackal as a good sheriff and how he is doing a good job. We all would like for everyone to work together. I saw the Mayor on klfy.com and was very impressed with what she said. And to an observer I am a cheerleader for Mr Ackal and though I have never gotten involved in politics it is because of people like you that next sheriff election I will !!!!! "

    an observer wrote on May 7, 2009 2:02 PM:

    " To Dewayne

    I didn't say solved crimes. I just said crimes. Atta boy. Keep being a cheerleader for Louis. "

    DeWayne wrote on May 7, 2009 1:44 AM:

    " To "An Observer" : Could it be that maybe just maybe we have a sheriff that is doing his job now rather than one who Maybe just Maybe didn't care? That's about the most boneheaded comment I've ever seen posted on any of these forums except for "Brown". "

    Be Nice wrote on May 7, 2009 12:24 AM:

    " So many people are hating on the Ipso. Does anyone remember the amount of law suits the city had to contend with when it had a police department? Evidently not. Just by avoiding those lawsuits the city has to be saving hundreds of thousands annually if not millions. I guess people forget quickly when they can complain about Ipso now. I'm sure all those lawyers are just waiting for a brilliant move by the city to reinstate a police force. I wonder how many of those lawyers survived after the nipd went down in flames? "

    D. Hertz wrote on May 6, 2009 9:59 PM:

    " The reason ex Sheriff Hebert had old klunker cars and out dated equipment, was that he couldn't afford anything else. He operated his department within his budget.

    Why can't Ackal do the same thing?

    If you can't afford new cars and new equipment, then don't buy them. We all have to exercise this discipline in our personal budgets, why can't we expect our elected officials to do the same thing?

    Government spending more of our money is getting really nauseating. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 6, 2009 7:27 PM:

    " I know they have lives but it would be good to check Working for starting pay? I don't think the problem is with Mr Ackal rather more money's job performance! By the way are you one of them who is whining about giving the money? Well guess what! Tuesday the city gave a portion. All the whining in the world or NI could stop that! After 11 yrs of service and still at starting pay go elsewhere if it that bad. I am sure they are not twisting his arm to stay. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeee "

    To got your back wrote on May 6, 2009 4:42 PM:

    " Who said they have to be doing this at work, they do have lives this person could be writing these on there own time...hellloooo... "

    wow wrote on May 6, 2009 8:28 AM:

    " If you have such a big problem with Ackal then you should not have voted him into office. If you didn't vote for him then you just have to wait until next election to get him out of office. Until you become Sheriff and deal with whatever issues Ackal is dealing with you should keep your mouth shut. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 6, 2009 6:52 AM:

    " To to more money
    I find it hard to believe that a deputy with lets say a 1 hr lunch break can drive home from the jail eat lunch read the forum respond to the forum drive back to the jail all in 1 hour. Lies by Ackal you say-No someone not doing their job. I think the jail should look at who is using their computer system! "

    an observer wrote on May 5, 2009 9:44 PM:

    " An attorney general's opinion is just that-an opinion. It does not have the force of law.

    If we give the Sheriff what he wants, does that mean there will be no more crime? Because it sure seems there is more now than when Hebert was Sheriff. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 5, 2009 7:33 PM:

    " To More Money
    Ever thought he is asking for more money to give you more money? And I never knew NI had so many accountants! OK do the math. The rent at the adjustment center is $30,000.00 a month x 12 =??????.?? And the chart in the above says how much other Sheriff's Dept are getting? Do the math. "

    to more money wrote on May 5, 2009 2:29 PM:

    " Are you saying that moral in the department is an issue? Ackal has had many people post on the forum that moral couldn't be better! I guess it depends what department you work in? The jail must be the exception to high moral. I thought Ackal was supposed to adjust corrections pay after the first 3 months once an assessment could be made of each officer and their duty assigments etc. Yet another LIE by the Acakl administration. "

    he knew wrote on May 5, 2009 2:25 PM:

    " Ackal knew what the contract was BEFORE he took office so to step up and claim that he can't do the job for the money he's being paid is a true indicator that he is NOT capable of managing his current budget so why do we want to give him more to spend? Ackal said in the campaign process that he could do a better job @ no time did he say his efforts required MORE money!!!! Trust me when I say this will not be the last time Ackal asks for more money. Stay Tuned! "

    More Money wrote on May 5, 2009 12:34 PM:

    " Asking for more money. I work at the jail. When Ackal took over he took my cost of living raise I had received for the last years - so patrol could have money. 11 yrs and now I am making starting pay. So YEAH I AM paying bills on what I was in 2004 and before that!!! Thank you ACKAL "

    He is NOT wrote on May 5, 2009 12:31 PM:

    " He is not doing a fine job. My house/yard have been robbed 6 times, 6 TIMES. I have been to SEE the sheriff himself and he was never AVAILABLE. Crime is not down were I live. New cars/old cars - SO WHAT. "

    Complaining wrote on May 5, 2009 12:27 PM:

    " I am not going to run for Sheriff because who will want to take on a department that owes millions of dollars in debt. No matter what Ackal says - the last sheriff did not leave him in debt. Ackal can take full credit for doing that. He has no business skills and is not man enough to admit it. He should be on patrol not running the dept. N.I. needs someone who is a complete package and Ackal is not it. "

    To to got your back wrote on May 5, 2009 8:54 AM:

    " It's not a cost of living increase. The current contract allows for a Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase, and it's only about 3% or 4%, which is very little. "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 5, 2009 7:05 AM:

    " I am sorry to hear that both you and your husband lost their jobs. So both of you must be on unemployment right? I think your time would be better spent at 2:08pm looking for a job and not responding to posting in the DI. "

    to got your back wrote on May 4, 2009 2:08 PM:

    " How many of you......I am and my husband too! that's 2!
    In fact, I was laid off, so I make less money than I did in 2004. And, do your research, the contract allowed for a cost of living increase. Ackal should have done his homework before he started spending money. Maybe he wouldn't owe the bond commission so much money by July 1st! "

    Got Your Back wrote on May 3, 2009 9:52 AM:

    " To all who whin about Mr Ackal asking for more money!
    How many of YOU are working for the wages YOU made in 2004?
    How many of YOU are running a household on what YOU ran it in 2004?
    How many of YOU think YOU could do it on what it was in 2004?
    Mr Ackal is the Sheriff trying to perform miracles on what it WAS in 2004! "

    TO Toconcerned wrote on May 1, 2009 9:48 PM:

    " The fact that you are LEAVING OUT is that the sheriff's department was already collecting the money from the ad valorem tax before the former sheriff entered into the law enforcement contract with the city. You are also leaving out the fact that the sheriff's department would CONTINUE to collect the ad valorem tax even if the sheriff's dept. was no longer contracted to provide law enforcement services for the city. Therefore any money collected from the ad valorem tax CANNOT be factored into the cost for providing law enforcement services to the city through the contract. "

    C.C. wrote on May 1, 2009 7:35 PM:

    " sheriff ackal an his entire staff are doing a fine an outstanding job,i think he should tell the city of new iberia to get lost an just patrol the parish ,like it used to be ,rid himself of all that BERRY DRAMA "

    Public Safety wrote on May 1, 2009 5:29 PM:

    " To the person talking about ad valorem taxes: Your are right; the city does pay ad valorem taxes to the IPSO. The city pays this to the Sheriff' regardless of whether there is a contract or not. If the contract were to end tomorrow, the city would still pay these ad valorem taxes. They were paid before the contract and will be still paid if the contract should end. This has absolutely nothing to do with the contracted dollar amount. City residents pay city and parish taxes. Parish residents only pay parish taxes. "

    Well wrote on May 1, 2009 2:16 PM:

    " Well, if the "city" residents don't feel he should get more money and that Sheriff Ackal has no credibility, then don't provide them any services. Go back to protecting just the parish residents, such as myself. Let them spend a ton of money and get their own department back together. Let them worry about all those crackheads and criminals in the city. "

    Interesting wrote on May 1, 2009 1:05 PM:

    " Well, if the contract is NULL and VOID, that is good. That means Sheriff Ackal can possibly begin to deal with the city regarding a contract for the money that his department is worth. They are worth alot to this city. Since Ackal took office this department has done far more that what previous administration could have ever done. Why, because Sheriff Ackal is determined to provide the type of law enforcement that this city needs and he is not afraid. Ok Sheriff Ackal, you go at it now and get what you need. "

    Enlighten wrote on May 1, 2009 11:37 AM:

    " Newsflash: Attorney General Buddy Caldwell issued late yesterday afternoon that the contract b/w the city & the sheriff's dept. is NULL & VOID!!!! "

    quit complaining wrote on May 1, 2009 10:46 AM:

    " if you can do a better job then run for sheriff! "

    Toconcerned wrote on May 1, 2009 10:00 AM:

    " It appears that every time comparisons are made with other cities, one fact is left out! The city tax payers also pay an ad valorem tax to the sheriff totaling 1.3 million. This amount is never factored in and that makes the city's contribution to law enfrocement around 4.7 million. So the sheriff is making more than stated. Maybe he could use more money but not the almost 2 million he is asking for. "

    Still Remembers wrote on May 1, 2009 9:51 AM:

    " The Sheriff came into a "broken-down" office. Moral was low and so was the money. Mr. Ackal is doing exactly as I expected him to do - straighten out something that took years to break. The old Mayor did not want her Civil Service police department and she instigated getting rid of them. The new Mayor made false promises just to get into office and now you have it. The moral is up with the deputies. Louis is not letting the bad eggs get away with anything & there is more police experience thanbefore. "

    To Sheriff Ackal wrote on May 1, 2009 9:34 AM:

    " If you mean that former Sheriff Hebert was better at managing his budget, you are talking about how he lacked in enforcement services for both city and parish, pulled his detectives just to meet the minimum of what was needed to patrol the city/parish, and that crime was up....but he did maintain his budget....then by all means, you're right.

    See, what you don't understand is that the New Iberia Police Department could not even run on the budget that Sheriff Ackal is given...so how can they expect Sheriff Ackal to do it? "

    Brian wrote on May 1, 2009 8:45 AM:

    " This is all well and good ,but , were all the IPSO employees who were out lobbing this week doing it on parish time? "

    My 2 cents wrote on May 1, 2009 7:47 AM:

    " I cannot believe that Sheriff Ackal is saying Ruth Fontenot, Sidney Hebert, and the Chamber of Commerce were wrong in 2004. These people convinced the citizens of New Iberia that the Iberia Parish Sheriff Department could provide the same law enforcement services as the New Iberia Police Department, and the consolidation would result in substantial savings to the tax payers.
    All of the cities used in the comparison, except New Iberia, have a Police Department. Now would be the right time to make plans for a new Police Department for New Iberia. "

    Sheriff Ackal wrote on May 1, 2009 7:16 AM:

    " I must have missed the article that indicated you said you would need a substantial increase from the City of New Iberia to provide better law enforcement for the citizens of New Iberia. All I ever read was you saying you could provide better law enforcement services than Sheriff Hebert. Apparently, you are now admitting that you cannot continue to provide better law enforcement than Sheriff Hebert, unless the City gives you more money. It seems that Sheriff Hebert might have be a better Sheriff than you, since he knew how to manage his budget. "

    just me in the city wrote on May 1, 2009 6:56 AM:

    " Ackal has no credibility. He cried wolf too many times when he first took office, and what has become of it? NOTHING! Had he lived within his budget in the beginning, and come to the city and said, in order to this or that, I will need more money, and demonstrated the benefit, I think he would have found an open minded city. Instead, he cried wolf, grandstanded ad infinitum, and ignored the budget until he was bankrupt. Policing is 1/3 of what the Sheriffs job is. He has failed the other 2/3rds. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

• Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid.

• Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

• Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather