Sheriff Louis Ackal’s administration is pushing for more money from the city to defray its costs and debt, while city officials say they would like to see more accountability on the part of the Sheriff’s Office than has been afforded in the past.
Vague to the point of muddying the waters is how several officials involved in the negotiations characterized the current contract, signed more than four years ago when former Sheriff Sid Hebert and former Mayor Ruth Fontenot were still in power.
|
Advertisement
|
Mayor Pro Tem Freddie DeCourt called the contract “pitiful.”
“There are no performance indicators,” DeCourt said. “It’s a very vague contract to spend that much money.”
Curry said the city pays the Sheriff’s Office about $3.4 million a year for its services, a figure adjusted annually according to the consumer price index. That amount is up from the original rate of $2.9 million.
City officials said they are counting on clearer language to translate into a more specific scope of services the Sheriff’s Office is obligated to provide and a stricter set of rules to which each side adheres.
Mayor Hilda Curry said she will push to add to the contract a means of recourse for when the Sheriff’s Office fails to provide a service it has promised.
“In the past, if there were two officers patrolling and we were supposed to have 10, we would have no recourse,” Curry said. “There should be some kind of accountability.”
The contract states the city is entitled to receive monthly reports, but there have been times they were not sent, Curry said.
For years, Curry and other city officials have requested maps of district-by-district crime breakdowns.
“I’ve been preaching that for over four years,” DeCourt said. “But it’s a new administration, so I’m being patient until early next year.”
The Sheriff’s Office, meanwhile, is asking for more money, though how much they’re asking for remains unclear. Elledge declined to discuss specifics but said, “It takes more money to run a police department now than it did then,” referring to the contract’s signing in June 2004.
But Curry said it is too early to say whether the city would be willing to spend more money on Sheriff’s Office services.
“They’ve presented some figures showing what it’s costing them to operate,” Curry said. “But there’s no way we can pay what they’re showing.”
Curry said the city will reassess the services it receives from the Sheriff’s Office before deciding whether paying more money is in its best interests.
“After four years, I know what I’d like to see,” Curry said, “but I wanted to give (Ackal) some time to see what he’d like.”
Another change in the works involves the Sheriff’s Office’s use of the 911 Communication Center in front of City Hall. Fontenot and Hebert signed a five-year agreement in 1999 stating there would be no charge for the use of the building. Curry said she would like to see that changed.
The city also plans to increase its compensation to the parish jail for housing city residents. The city pays $22.39 per day for each adult city resident in the parish jail. Curry said this price will increase to $24.39 per day, per person.
“There’s a substantial cost that the city still bears a burden for when it comes to law enforcement issues,” Curry said.


Comments
yes it was wrote on Jan 12, 2009 3:34 PM:
To OK wrote on Jan 12, 2009 11:23 AM:
OK Contd wrote on Jan 11, 2009 5:45 PM:
OK wrote on Jan 11, 2009 5:42 PM:
Joe wrote on Jan 11, 2009 12:38 AM:
To why bother wrote on Jan 10, 2009 6:12 PM:
To why bother wrote on Jan 10, 2009 5:42 PM:
In 2004 Sheriff Hebert presented his law enforcement contract proposal to everyone in attendance in the city council meeting room. Sheriff Hebert said "The NIPD has some of the finest young officers in Acadiana. We do not have the manpower to do this without the inclusion of both departments." Many former NIPD officers went to work for him. Many others chose not to apply and went to work elswhere. Through out the contract Hebert had difficulties hiring and/or keeping a minimum staff. "
Zoe wrote on Jan 10, 2009 3:42 PM:
And anyone who thinks law enforcement is not going to cost has their head in the sand. I am glad money was borrowed to buy equipment for our officers. Who wants a police force that has old cars and officers that have no training or equipment? "
Zoe wrote on Jan 10, 2009 3:35 PM:
The money saved by contracting with the Sheriff is by elimination of duplicated services like communications, supervisors, administrative costs.
And didn't Hebert appoint someone as a liason to monitor services. If so, how did he let Hebert get by w/ only 2 officers instead of 10 ? And now Ackal is criticized for giving us 10? "
To Joe wrote on Jan 9, 2009 3:21 PM:
Why bother wrote on Jan 8, 2009 9:14 PM:
To IPSO Revenue Sources are not Extra wrote on Jan 8, 2009 8:23 PM:
It is much safer within the city than previously...pay mayor. "
Ed wrote on Jan 8, 2009 6:36 PM:
JoAnn wrote on Jan 8, 2009 4:47 PM:
Waiting for Answer wrote on Jan 8, 2009 2:56 PM:
Do the vendors give the Sheriff Department better deals? Are Deputies willing to work for lower salaries? Can anyone explain why the Sheriff Department can provide law enforcement cheaper? "
IPSO Revenue Sources are Not Extra wrote on Jan 8, 2009 12:03 PM:
IPSO Revenue Sources are Not Extra wrote on Jan 8, 2009 11:31 AM:
To Transplanted Politics as Usual wrote on Jan 8, 2009 9:12 AM:
In 2005, approximately 3000 people voted to keep the poorly written law enforcement contract and about 2000 people voted against it.
Louis Ackal never claimed he could do it all cheaper. Mr. Ackal wanted it done right. The people elected Sheriff Ackal, and I believe he has provided better service since taking office in July 2008. "
Make the call wrote on Jan 8, 2009 5:59 AM:
Politics as usual wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:28 PM:
I also seem to recall a city vote regarding the NIPD. Most public predictions had the NIPD returning. 60% of the voters disagreed. There were more smart people in this city than I believed. "
George wrote on Jan 7, 2009 7:29 PM:
Joe wrote on Jan 7, 2009 1:58 PM:
Weigh It Out wrote on Jan 6, 2009 11:18 PM:
District 8 resident wrote on Jan 6, 2009 6:15 PM:
Joe wrote on Jan 6, 2009 12:14 PM:
To Re-negotiate or Not wrote on Jan 6, 2009 11:56 AM:
Also agrees with Joe wrote on Jan 6, 2009 10:31 AM:
I agree with Joe wrote on Jan 5, 2009 7:51 PM:
Joe wrote on Jan 5, 2009 3:40 PM:
ACR wrote on Jan 5, 2009 1:38 PM:
Copper wrote on Jan 4, 2009 8:50 PM:
Attorney at Law wrote on Jan 4, 2009 7:14 PM:
Oh well, I guess it's none of my business........... "
TO Atty. at Law wrote on Jan 4, 2009 3:28 PM:
My 2 Cents wrote on Jan 4, 2009 5:41 AM:
Now, if you telephone the Mayor’s Office or speak with your City Councilman with a law enforcement issue, they refer you to the Sheriff Department. In other words, they have the opportunity to pass the buck. "
Ah now your not thinking wrote on Jan 3, 2009 7:56 PM:
Attorney at Law wrote on Jan 3, 2009 4:15 PM:
Yes, the same Civil Service laws that helped to protect the few bad apples that led to the PD untimely demise.
I could be mistaken, but the only way around Civil Service is to change the City Charter. Which would probably involve the City Council, opening another can of worms.
It's not like trying to revive a High School football team after not having one.
Going 0-20 in football for 2 years can't be compared to 0-20 in Law Enforcement w/crime. "
My 2 cents wrote on Jan 3, 2009 9:21 AM:
As for recruiting, I would be willing to bet that if Mayor Curry would start accepting applications for the New Iberia Police Department, Sheriff Ackal would lose more than 50% of his commissioned Deputies.
If this happened, the Mayor and City Council could then control spending for law enforcement services. "
Joseph wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:04 PM:
me wrote on Jan 1, 2009 1:15 PM:
Old Time Cop wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:17 PM:
Copper wrote on Dec 31, 2008 12:41 PM:
My 2 cents wrote on Dec 31, 2008 9:49 AM:
What makes you think that the Sheriff, who has not showed any fiscal restraints, will not be asking for additional funds next year, the year after, etc? At what point does the City decide to bite the bullet and bring their Police Department back? "
city guy wrote on Dec 30, 2008 6:11 AM:
NI Transplant wrote on Dec 29, 2008 6:17 PM:
2. I thought Sheriff Ackal could do it "better and cheaper" than Sid Hebert?
3. This is the same mayor who needed time to generate "the figures" when the Chamber requested them prior to the NIPD vote, yet was able to state on record what the figures were for the council a week prior.
4. South Louisiana politics. 'Nuff said. "
BILL wrote on Dec 28, 2008 1:37 AM:
2 Cents wrote on Dec 27, 2008 8:16 PM:
BILL wrote on Dec 27, 2008 4:49 PM:
Copper wrote on Dec 26, 2008 7:37 PM: