But while the results may raise more questions than answers, police have named the woman’s husband as a person of interest in the case due to inconsistencies in his statements to police, Ackal said.
Judy Landry, 61, was found dead July 1 in her home on Robert S. Drive just minutes after Ackal’s inauguration, but the circumstances of her death remain unclear as the Sheriff’s Office continues to investigate it as a possible homicide.
|
Advertisement |
“Does that mean she did that to herself? I don’t know,” Ackal said. “Could it be that an individual wore gloves when they did that?”
Landry’s husband, Edmond, told police he found his wife unresponsive when he returned home around noon and said he removed the ties from her neck with scissors, Ackal said.
“What surprised me was, the husband cut the zip ties off and his DNA wasn’t on the zip ties,” Ackal said. “There’s no DNA from anybody else on those ties.”
In a telephone interview Tuesday, Edmond Landry confirmed he cut the ties in an effort to revive his wife but denied any involvement in her death, adding he was at work at the time of her death.
Judy had a history of “problems,” he said, and had been suffering from depression for more than a year and taking Xanax.
One of her three sons was in prison in Florida at the time of her death and another recently divorced. Edmond said he spent more than $10,000 on her treatment and still owes a local hospital.
“I love my wife and I’m still grieving,” he said.
Asked to comment on the police considering him a person of interest in the case, he said, “I don’t know what they’re talking about. Imagine you come home and find your wife dead.”
Edmond Landry said he usually telephoned his wife from work each morning around 10:30 a.m. to check on her. On the morning of her death, Edmond said he received no response to several phone calls and decided to go home.
He said he found his wife “purple” and dead in the dining room when he arrived.
The Iberia Parish Coroner’s Office report only identified the cause of death to be strangulation but was unable to determine the nature. Edmond has not been charged in the death.
“We have no evidence that we could take to court and say ‘this individual killed his wife,’ ” Ackal said. “We don’t have that.”
But another point of interest for investigators has been the marks left by the ties around Judy’s neck.
“The ligature marks on the neck came up from the neck going up behind the ears, which meant somebody would have had to take them and pull up over the top of her head,” Ackal said. “I can think of a lot of ways to commit suicide and that’s not one of them.”
Despite the confusion, Ackal said the case has not run cold.
“The biggest thing we’re working on now is what some of the neighbors may have seen,” Ackal said.
Some of their testimony is “promising but not enough to take to the district attorney,” he said.
“(The investigation) is not where we want to be and I’m not happy about it.”


Comments
Big problems found at our crime labs wrote on Dec 21, 2008 7:31 AM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 20, 2008 10:51 AM:
citizen wrote on Dec 19, 2008 7:06 PM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 17, 2008 11:37 AM:
RECALL wrote on Dec 17, 2008 9:29 AM:
Let us know what you think. RECALL him.
Start commenting on here about this RECALL.
RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL "
To I Want My Money Back wrote on Dec 17, 2008 6:35 AM:
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:32 PM:
No evidence: Blame the sheriff and corner on that one, but there exits neighbors who saw something.
No opportunity: You are wrong on that one, at least on two occasions that day there was opportunity. One early, one around 8 am.
No Way: Wrong again, failed polygraph, ellusive behavior, degrading remarks about wife and on and on.... sorry try again. "
No motive No evidence No opportunity No way wrote on Dec 16, 2008 12:22 AM:
RECALL wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:47 PM:
RECALL SHERIFF ACKAL "
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:18 AM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:08 AM:
something is fishy wrote on Dec 15, 2008 9:01 AM:
something is fishy wrote on Dec 15, 2008 8:53 AM:
I want my money back wrote on Dec 15, 2008 8:28 AM:
Sheriff Unhappy in action wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:20 AM:
erathdog wrote on Dec 13, 2008 6:00 PM:
To The Entire Family wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:27 PM:
For those of you who are not doing the investigation it is not fair for you to say who did or did not do it. Leave that judgment for our ruler in heaven.
God Bless! "
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 11, 2008 5:56 PM:
true wrote on Dec 10, 2008 4:16 PM:
citizen wrote on Dec 10, 2008 3:24 PM:
To CSI wrote on Dec 10, 2008 3:16 PM:
CSI wrote on Dec 10, 2008 11:50 AM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:34 AM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:20 AM:
IF YOU ARE wrote on Dec 9, 2008 3:37 PM:
CSI wrote on Dec 9, 2008 2:58 PM:
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong....Shouldn't DNA only show up if there were blood, saliva, skin samples or other body secretions involved. Just handling something (fingerprints) won't leave DNA traces....Am I wrong in this? "
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 9, 2008 8:55 AM:
MR CLEAN wrote on Dec 9, 2008 3:13 AM:
Just to clear things up. "
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 8, 2008 1:14 PM:
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 8, 2008 1:05 PM:
RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 8, 2008 6:44 AM:
Time of death is still the key issue in this case.
My point was and still is, we're all too quick to rush to judgement.
My prayers are and will continue to be with all of the family. "
RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 8, 2008 6:37 AM:
You claim I am trying to redirect with false facts? You tell me anything I said that was false?
I brought up the dog DNA as that precious dog (or any dog) will be around their master, especially in this situation, think, will ya!
I believe there to be unanswered questions just like everyone. NONE of us know all the "FACTS". As far as releasing "FACTS" to the public when an investigation is ongoing is a sure way of blowing any case, if it's taken to trial. "
Justice for All wrote on Dec 7, 2008 6:55 PM:
Recent information suggest that Sheriff Ackal should excuse himself since he personally knows one of the "persons of interest" in this case. If for no other reason, the FBI must enter this case. Thank you for printing this. "
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 7, 2008 4:27 PM:
true wrote on Dec 7, 2008 3:40 PM:
RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:46 AM:
Eddie and Judy had a routine and they followed it to the "T".
Instead of pointing fingers or rushing to judgment of someone please remember all family members in your thoughts and prayers.
How would you feel if you walked in and found one of your loved ones in this situation. Having to relive the image on a daily basis.
If gloves were used like the Sheriff indicated, where is the fiber evidence of those gloves? "
RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:29 AM:
Time of death, that is key. And yes, it can be proven Eddie was at work.
You people want to convict a man without all the facts. Put yourself in his shoes. How would you feel?
As far as DNA on ties, is the dogs DNA on it? "
to justice for all wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:46 PM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:27 PM:
true wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:10 PM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 6, 2008 2:34 PM:
Pink Brat wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:34 AM:
I am praying for this family, that her sons can find healing within God's grace and light, and that justice will be done in the end.
God bless! "
icare wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:03 PM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 5, 2008 5:56 PM:
Oscar wrote on Dec 5, 2008 4:27 PM:
What ever happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty? Things that make you say "HMMMM"...
Be HEALTHY
BE KIND
Respect the Environment "
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:48 PM:
Shame on you Ackal. You should resign. "
erathdog wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:17 PM:
erathdog wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:15 PM:
TRaveler wrote on Dec 5, 2008 11:21 AM:
W.M.Daughter-in-law wrote on Dec 4, 2008 6:22 PM:
Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 4, 2008 5:32 PM:
concerned citizen wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:48 PM:
concerned citizen wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:42 PM:
Lynn wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:21 PM:
Logically speaking, I would think the cops would want a good chance of being able to put him away if he did kill her. "
lared wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:21 PM:
TO YEP wrote on Dec 4, 2008 12:39 PM:
Your story doesn't prove anything. "
me wrote on Dec 4, 2008 10:10 AM:
Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:45 AM:
Yep wrote on Dec 4, 2008 7:34 AM:
Simply wrote on Dec 3, 2008 8:56 PM:
erathdog wrote on Dec 3, 2008 6:16 PM:
ON the flip side, XANAX is the devils drug. Women will wack out if they over medicate with XANAX. I've seen it before. Xanax is poison on a bad mind. "
OJ simpson wrote on Dec 3, 2008 3:05 PM:
Just Me wrote on Dec 3, 2008 2:46 PM: