DNA tests
are in

BY JIM MUSTIAN
THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 2:08 PM CST

More than five months after the unexplained strangulation death of a New Iberia woman, recently completed DNA testing has proved inconclusive in the Iberia Parish Sheriff’s Office’s effort to determine the nature of the death, Sheriff Louis Ackal said Tuesday.

But while the results may raise more questions than answers, police have named the woman’s husband as a person of interest in the case due to inconsistencies in his statements to police, Ackal said.

Judy Landry, 61, was found dead July 1 in her home on Robert S. Drive just minutes after Ackal’s inauguration, but the circumstances of her death remain unclear as the Sheriff’s Office continues to investigate it as a possible homicide. 

Advertisement
The Acadiana Crime Lab, one of two labs to perform the testing, found only Landry’s DNA on the zip ties used in her strangulation, Ackal said. But the DNA was found only on the part of the ties that made contact with her neck — not on the ends of the ties that might be pulled in tightening them, Ackal said.

“Does that mean she did that to herself? I don’t know,” Ackal said. “Could it be that an individual wore gloves when they did that?”

Landry’s husband, Edmond, told police he found his wife unresponsive when he returned home around noon and said he removed the ties from her neck with scissors, Ackal said.

“What surprised me was, the husband cut the zip ties off and his DNA wasn’t on the zip ties,” Ackal said. “There’s no DNA from anybody else on those ties.”

In a telephone interview Tuesday, Edmond Landry confirmed he cut the ties in an effort to revive his wife but denied any involvement in her death, adding he was at work at the time of her death.  

Judy had a history of “problems,” he said, and had been suffering from depression for more than a year and taking Xanax.

One of her three sons was in prison in Florida at the time of her death and another recently divorced. Edmond said he spent more than $10,000 on her treatment and still owes a local hospital.

“I love my wife and I’m still grieving,” he said.

Asked to comment on the police considering him a person of interest in the case, he said, “I don’t know what they’re talking about. Imagine you come home and find your wife dead.”

Edmond Landry said he usually telephoned his wife from work each morning around 10:30 a.m. to check on her. On the morning of her death, Edmond said he received no response to several phone calls and decided to go home.

He said he found his wife “purple” and dead in the dining room when he arrived.

The Iberia Parish Coroner’s Office report only identified the cause of death to be strangulation but was unable to determine the nature. Edmond has not been charged in the death.

“We have no evidence that we could take to court and say ‘this individual killed his wife,’ ” Ackal said. “We don’t have that.”

But another point of interest for investigators has been the marks left by the ties around Judy’s neck.

“The ligature marks on the neck came up from the neck going up behind the ears, which meant somebody would have had to take them and pull up over the top of her head,” Ackal said. “I can think of a lot of ways to commit suicide and that’s not one of them.”

Despite the confusion, Ackal said the case has not run cold.

“The biggest thing we’re working on now is what some of the neighbors may have seen,” Ackal said.

Some of their testimony is “promising but not enough to take to the district attorney,” he said.

“(The investigation) is not where we want to be and I’m not happy about it.”

Comments

    Big problems found at our crime labs wrote on Dec 21, 2008 7:31 AM:

    " The FBI crime lab, which is officially recognized as country's best, was found to be corrupt and incompetent. Professionals lied about thousands of DNA tests and other evidence. The best lab protocols didn't catch this corruption and incompetence. Government reports crime labs across the country are incompetent, dirty, disorderly dump piles of evidence. Billions of tax dollars are needed to correct this growing problem. Evidence to be tested is piled in public hallways for months. This is the norm, not the exception, even at the FBI crime lab. A-crime-lab-located-in-corrupt-south-Louisiana-is-not-the-best-of-anything-or-above-Louisiana-corruption-and-incompetence. "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 20, 2008 10:51 AM:

    " Many Thanks to citizen and everyone else who has kept this section going! This was the first of my parents to go and the bad part is that it was'nt her choice! This will be the first christmas ever for my kids not to recieve their MawMaw Judys Xmas cards! I miss her and love her as much! Merry Christmas to everyone! Love your loved ones because you REALLY NEVER KNOW what tomorrow will bring! Boogie "

    citizen wrote on Dec 19, 2008 7:06 PM:

    " Don't let the case get cold stay on top of it. Every chance you get find out what they are doing about it. Its been a few months with no answers. I am so sorry for the loss of your mother and if it were my family I would want answers. God be with you and your family. "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 17, 2008 11:37 AM:

    " To Recall: If you want to talk about the sheriff being recalled start your own comment section under OPINION! This section is about my mother not the sheriff! I know it was his first day on the job and his first murder to deal with! I'm not pointing fingers I'm looking for answers!He has done all he knows to do and maybe its time he asks for some professional help! Not everybody is perfect in their feild and needs some kind of help sometimes! Lets keep this column about trying to find out what happened to my mom! BOOGIE "

    RECALL wrote on Dec 17, 2008 9:29 AM:

    " RECALL RECALL, come on people lets booth this guy out before we have more unsolved murders in the city and parish. Start a petition, sign it, get him out.
    Let us know what you think. RECALL him.
    Start commenting on here about this RECALL.

    RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL "

    To I Want My Money Back wrote on Dec 17, 2008 6:35 AM:

    " Say what you want about the Sheriff's office but do NOT say the Crime Lab is incompetent. The Acadiana Crime Lab has the most competent and professional scientists there are ESPECIALLY in their DNA department.They can only process the evidence collected for them-it's not like what people see on CSI.The officers respond to the crime scenes and bring the evidence THEY collect to the lab for processing-every now and then they may get called to a crime scene but that's not often and is usually after the agency has already processed the scene.Our lab is one of the best!! "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 16, 2008 2:32 PM:

    " No motive: Someone doesnt kill for the pleasure of it, there is motive, at least three scenarios.
    No evidence: Blame the sheriff and corner on that one, but there exits neighbors who saw something.
    No opportunity: You are wrong on that one, at least on two occasions that day there was opportunity. One early, one around 8 am.
    No Way: Wrong again, failed polygraph, ellusive behavior, degrading remarks about wife and on and on.... sorry try again. "

    No motive No evidence No opportunity No way wrote on Dec 16, 2008 12:22 AM:

    " What would be the motive for the husband to kill wife? Is there some theory for motive or not? "

    RECALL wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:47 PM:

    " Is there a way we can recall this sheriff and his band of merry men? Let's recall him.
    RECALL SHERIFF ACKAL "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:18 AM:

    " Just another note to the sheriffs office! If they think this case is going to grow cold and go away think again! There are other ways of getting something done and "RIGHT! "I am starting to get more upset as time goes by! Something must be done and soon! Still waiting to hear somthing! "Unhappy Son" Boogie "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:08 AM:

    " Well the sheriffs office has had enough time to come up with something! They have made too many mistakes now,so why dont they ask for some professional help? They everdently don't have a clue if they did then maybe they would answer the phone or return a phone call! Maybe we could shed some light on things! They must not have what they need to arrest my step dad so go looking somewhere else! Maybe he's not the answer and who ever is, is right under their nose! I think they are as clueless as day 1! Boogie "

    something is fishy wrote on Dec 15, 2008 9:01 AM:

    " another thing, in the heat of the moment, why would anyone be so careful not to touch the tie rap?? it had to be really tight on her neck to kill her, and i would imagine he rush to get the tie rap off, but NEVER TOUCHED IT????? come on. I believe Edmond knows who did this, if it wasnt him. i dont know how anyone could live with themselves, after hurting this loving person. "

    something is fishy wrote on Dec 15, 2008 8:53 AM:

    " didnt detectives prove she was murdered? if i remember correctly, Edmond said he believed she was murdered, and the detectives said so also. so why does he state she was suffering from depression?? why would anyone state that if she was killed? sounds like a cover up. also, didnt todd (edmond`s son) have a black eye for the funeral? something is fishy!!!!!! "

    I want my money back wrote on Dec 15, 2008 8:28 AM:

    " Ackal said DNA was found only on the part of ties that made contact with her neck — not on the ends of the ties. There may have been DNA on tie ends, but the collection process botched it or error in DNA processing destroyed it. Everything you see on TV about professionals collecting evidence doesn't apply here. The collection process in this case destroyed easily collected evidence of body temperature because of official incompetence. Our sheriff office, coroner's office and crime lab are jokes compared to the professional standards shown on TV crime shows. "

    Sheriff Unhappy in action wrote on Dec 15, 2008 3:20 AM:

    " My condolences to Bobby HendricksIII and his family. I'm sure the family wants this case solved correctly with truth, not Sheriff Unhappy's fantasy conviction. The voters wanted a change from this kind of bumbling around in Sheriff's Office and abuse of power when frustrated. Sheriff Unhappy counting on neighbors to suddenly remember something important 6 months after the fact is more bumbling innuendo. Such late remembered testimony would be unreliable at best. Sheriff Unhappy and his three dwarfs, Sloppy, Dopey and Sleazy, should stop spreading innuendo. "

    erathdog wrote on Dec 13, 2008 6:00 PM:

    " We have all been conditioned to be suspicous due to all the insane events that we have witnessed in the last twenty years. If Mr. Landry is completely innocent, it must be a real trying time for him. He has to understand that he will be considered a suspect. We also have to wonder what was that coroner thinking by not considering this a crime scene. Is he ignorant? "

    To The Entire Family wrote on Dec 11, 2008 11:27 PM:

    " On both sides I am deeply sorry for the loss of your loved one. It's a very sad situation. You are in my thought's & prayers.
    For those of you who are not doing the investigation it is not fair for you to say who did or did not do it. Leave that judgment for our ruler in heaven.
    God Bless! "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 11, 2008 5:56 PM:

    " To true: You said the right words. Judy was the only living member of the family left in the Iberia area. The whole family includes 3 sons and 3 brothers who are scattered in three different states. Perhaps the sheriff has taken advantage of this fact to be so rude in his actions. Well Mr. Sheriff this family is well known in the Iberia parish area. So although you are recently elected, you must want another term. SO work hard, real hard at solving this case. "

    true wrote on Dec 10, 2008 4:16 PM:

    " You want to know what is really sad. The Sheriff didn't have the decency to contact Judy's relatives before talking to the paper. This article is how we received our information. What kind of Sheriff would do that. To all, how would you feel if this is the way you received information on the murder of a loved one. Where is Edmond's trace DNA if he cut the ties off like he said. He is obviously lieing "

    citizen wrote on Dec 10, 2008 3:24 PM:

    " Call his job and see if he was their, maybe he parked his vehicle at the ball park and walked home and did it "

    To CSI wrote on Dec 10, 2008 3:16 PM:

    " anytime you touch or handle anything you can leave your DNA behind.DNA is found not only in body fluids but also skin cells,hair,etc.Your skin sheds millions of cells everytime you touch something.This is not controversial and it is a very reliable form of testing.To those saying DNA should have been on the ties.I know NOTHING about this case but if you cut something without touching it there won't be DNA on it-that was my first thought on the matter.At any rate unless you are the person involved or investigator you don't know so don't spread rumors!My prayers are with the/victim's/family. "

    CSI wrote on Dec 10, 2008 11:50 AM:

    " Well it seems like I answered my own question. Apparently there is what's known as "touch" DNA, minute traces left behind after touching something. Seems like an advancement in DNA testing. It was used to clear JonBenet Ramsey's parents of her murder. Still somewhat controversial by some accounts........Anyway, carry on! "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:34 AM:

    " To Everyone keeping these comments going! Some of you are using code names to hide behind and thats your choice.Believe it or not I know which ones are my kin, you don't! I feel that my mother is the reason these comments have sufaced and continue to keep going! I feel she is here with me in everything i write! Its not stupidity its my moms way of talking through us! She is'nt totally gone YET! So to everyone ,on our side or not; THANKYOU VERY MUCH! Together we will find justice! BOOGIE "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:20 AM:

    " To If You Are: To let you know that I am Judys oldest son of 42 yrs. You everdently dont know my mother or you would know there are three of us! Besides that what stupidity would you be talking about I am trying to get someone to at least talk to us from the sheriffs office .Unless you have some info about this case I would sugest you stay out of this! I put my name on these comments so people that know who i am will recognize that! Judy Ann Hendricks' SON BOOGIE!!!! "

    IF YOU ARE wrote on Dec 9, 2008 3:37 PM:

    " My comment is to the person that is saying you are Judy's son. It makes me wonder what kind of person you are to sit there and talk about your mother and entertian these people with your stupidity. You should be ashamed. I honestly do not believe you are the son of this woman. My prayer's are with the true family of this woman. "

    CSI wrote on Dec 9, 2008 2:58 PM:

    " Ok I didn't have time to read all the posts, this may have been brought up.

    Somebody correct me if I'm wrong....Shouldn't DNA only show up if there were blood, saliva, skin samples or other body secretions involved. Just handling something (fingerprints) won't leave DNA traces....Am I wrong in this? "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 9, 2008 8:55 AM:

    " Agree with you Mr. Clear. This is not a matter for FBI since its not a federal crime. But the FBI is chartered to assist local law enforcement official s in the conduct of a criminal investigation at their invitation. This usually happens in complex cases where their are no local resources to assist the sheriff. Once invited, the FBI usually conducts a broad ranging sweep of all the elements of the case, including background checks, financial audits, personal activities etc, and gives the sheriff a final report. "

    MR CLEAN wrote on Dec 9, 2008 3:13 AM:

    " The FBI has no jurisdiction, as this case does not fall under any category that would make it federal. If there is a conflict of interest on the part of the Sheriff's office, the State Police would be the agency to take over the investigation.

    Just to clear things up. "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 8, 2008 1:14 PM:

    " Do you have information on this case to help solve it. Then contact the sheriff. Did you overhear anything which will help the sheriff to bring justice to this case. Do you know anyone who has information about the case. Have you seen anything which pertains to this case which will help solve it. Did someone tell you they know something about the case but are afraid to come forth. Help is needed here, badly. No reward, except the personal satisfaction of doing a good deed. Help the law, the community, the family.pls "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 8, 2008 1:05 PM:

    " Look at the comments of some people here and you think this is a contest about who likes Ackal and who doesn't and who likes Mr. Landry and who doesn't. Let me please remind you that this is about a brutal murder of a person and a murderer who is still walking the streets. Folks lets keep our focus on this issue alone and keep your personal comments about the sheriff and the "person or persons of interest" out of these comments. Can anyone here help the sheriff to solve this case? Do you have information. "

    RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 8, 2008 6:44 AM:

    " And no, I am not close to Edmond (Eddie). If he committed this crime, he should pay the price for it.

    Time of death is still the key issue in this case.

    My point was and still is, we're all too quick to rush to judgement.

    My prayers are and will continue to be with all of the family. "

    RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 8, 2008 6:37 AM:

    " To True:

    You claim I am trying to redirect with false facts? You tell me anything I said that was false?

    I brought up the dog DNA as that precious dog (or any dog) will be around their master, especially in this situation, think, will ya!

    I believe there to be unanswered questions just like everyone. NONE of us know all the "FACTS". As far as releasing "FACTS" to the public when an investigation is ongoing is a sure way of blowing any case, if it's taken to trial. "

    Justice for All wrote on Dec 7, 2008 6:55 PM:

    " Some of the comments I have written have not been published. I follow your rules and I would appreciate it if you would publish what I send to you. What has been sent is factual and comes from reliable sources.
    Recent information suggest that Sheriff Ackal should excuse himself since he personally knows one of the "persons of interest" in this case. If for no other reason, the FBI must enter this case. Thank you for printing this. "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 7, 2008 4:27 PM:

    " To Rush To Judgement:You sound like you knew them pretty well and if so you are probably a friend of Edmonds! She was my mother and i guarantee you don't know the side of that relatoinship we do! Nobody is passing judgement! we just want answers! The sheriffs office and the coroners office have made enough mistakes in my mothers case as it is! We dont need anymore! Now who ever wrote that the FBI wont get involved! You dont know anything at all! They already tried and Akel would'nt let them!! BOOGIE "

    true wrote on Dec 7, 2008 3:40 PM:

    " The FBI can get involved if the Sheriff requests it! He has refused! Polygraphs have been done. The results? Latex gloves leave no fibers! DNA is left when someone touches an object. Why would the dogs DNA be on the ties? We don't know if the dog touched them but Edmond did. Rush to Judgement, you are trying to redirect with false facts and you know it. You must be really close to Edmond. "

    RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:46 AM:

    " Furthermore, there had been an electrical or phone van in that area at time of death.

    Eddie and Judy had a routine and they followed it to the "T".

    Instead of pointing fingers or rushing to judgment of someone please remember all family members in your thoughts and prayers.

    How would you feel if you walked in and found one of your loved ones in this situation. Having to relive the image on a daily basis.

    If gloves were used like the Sheriff indicated, where is the fiber evidence of those gloves? "

    RushToJudgement wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:29 AM:

    " Anyone that knew Judy and Eddie, knew they loved each other very much. Because someone is called "a person of interest" does not mean they are guilty. The closest person to the victim (husband,wife, family memeber, etc) are always the person of interest.

    Time of death, that is key. And yes, it can be proven Eddie was at work.

    You people want to convict a man without all the facts. Put yourself in his shoes. How would you feel?

    As far as DNA on ties, is the dogs DNA on it? "

    to justice for all wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:46 PM:

    " You street lawyers never seem to stop amazing me with your complete lack of knowledge. The F.B.I.??? Let's brake this down..Federal Bureau of Investigation. Where is the Federal crime here? The FBI will not come into a local investigation unless the are signs they would have jurisdiction, ie. crossing state lines to commit the murder. In your little world, why didn't Sid call them for the "Beals" case? You "drinking the cool aid" die hard Sid fan's just can't stand the fact that Ackal is really doing a MUCH better job!!! "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:27 PM:

    " To Oscar...Did you read the article on Deputy Arrested for the second time for burglary! INOCCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY? Or What! BOOGIE "

    true wrote on Dec 6, 2008 6:10 PM:

    " I also posted 2 comments and the paper did not post them. This paper can post information that is not verified but won't post comments that speak the truth. Free speech? Bull! Mr. Editor you are a joke just as the Sheriff and Coroner are. Prove me wrong and post this comment!!! "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 6, 2008 2:34 PM:

    " Why don' the sheriffs dept. get the FBI involved? We have tried and they refused! Stating that they could handle it! What concerns me the most is what i tried to say in the comment the paper didnt print!They will not contact us or return the 1st phone call to me! The FBI will and 48 hours will! Something better take place soon or they will be answering to somebody higher up!I hav'nt heard from my step dad either!I know this is hard on him but he is not alone!!!! BOOGIE "

    Pink Brat wrote on Dec 6, 2008 10:34 AM:

    " I took Xanax for about a month after my uncle was murdered. It helped me tremendously and it was the only way I could get some sleep at night, in order to just function during the day.

    I am praying for this family, that her sons can find healing within God's grace and light, and that justice will be done in the end.

    God bless! "

    icare wrote on Dec 5, 2008 9:03 PM:

    " Family, just be thankful that your loved one no longer has to live with this monster.Justice will come for Judy.He will pay for his ill deeds.He knows the truth and will soon not be able to live with it.Our judicial system is not victim friendly but our Lord is.Just remember to count your blessing and our Lord will take care of the rest.My prayers are with you.Remember, Christmas is a time for miracles.Your miracle is on it's way. "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 5, 2008 5:56 PM:

    " Well i see the paper prints only the comments they want to. I wrote two comments and only one got printed! I am fixing to get more involved and everything i've said and have to say will be heard and printed! BOOGIE "

    Oscar wrote on Dec 5, 2008 4:27 PM:

    " Hey Guys,
    What ever happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty? Things that make you say "HMMMM"...
    Be HEALTHY
    BE KIND
    Respect the Environment "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:48 PM:

    " To Lynn: I didnt mention the IPSO, its was the DA, the District Attorney. The "IPSO facto "sheriff and his band of keystone cops should be ashame and regretful for the way they conducted this investigation. From the start they should have asked for FBI assistance to solve this crime. But their inflated igoes prevented them from seeking much need help. Now IPSO you let a criminal go free with no possibility of ever bringing him to justice.
    Shame on you Ackal. You should resign. "

    erathdog wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:17 PM:

    " I have a novel idea, why doesn't the husband submit to the polygraph? "

    erathdog wrote on Dec 5, 2008 3:15 PM:

    " If the coroner neglected to take body temperatures and ambient temperature, he should be handed his pink slip. Complete idiot. Does he not watch crime t.v. The habits of murder investigation goes as follows. "wife found dead, look very closely at husband first. That is the rule." Were the tie wraps pulled from the front or back of the head. From the back, it's murder. If you commit suicide, you'd pull them from the front. "

    TRaveler wrote on Dec 5, 2008 11:21 AM:

    " Well judy wasnt on any of these medications at the time of her death.A pill count was done and also a referrence to the dates of the prescritions were checked.Blood test should of been done to see if she was over medicated.I dont think she was over medicated at the time of her death.Now as for body temperture the corenor screw that up by sending a rookie to the crime scene.He didnt take a body temp and He had already made his diagnoses as suicide with no establish and suffiicient evidence.I think the coroner needs to retire. "

    W.M.Daughter-in-law wrote on Dec 4, 2008 6:22 PM:

    " My thoughts on this horrible situation is having doubt in the people that you have always loved on top of the loss of someone very special . I think that what we all want to know is the truth so that everyone can move on with their lives no matter the out come,we need closure.Hopefully all avenues are being checked out. "

    Bobby HendricksIII wrote on Dec 4, 2008 5:32 PM:

    " I am Judys oldest son i talked to her two days before this happened and she was fine. I am not divorced so i dont know where he is getting his info.My brother was to be released from prison on sept. 1st and she was happy about that. Eddie seems to make this sound as if my brother was a hardened criminal and thats not the way it was. He was only in there for less than a year for nothing major. He recieved more than forty letters from our mother of nothing but happiness! still wtg 4 JUSTICE! "

    concerned citizen wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:48 PM:

    " You don't have to actually touch something in order to cut it...maybe he was holding her head when he cut the ties "

    concerned citizen wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:42 PM:

    " I wonder has there been a time of death established. If so, can Mr. Landry proove to have been at work during the time of death? I think the Police are grasping at straws here! "

    Lynn wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:21 PM:

    " TO: "Justice for ALL" I don't believe it's a matter of the IPSO not having any "balls". If they tried him for this crime and he was found innocent, then they eventually came upon enough evidence that would convict him, wouldn't that qualify as "Double Jeopardy" and he wouldn't be able to be tried for it again?

    Logically speaking, I would think the cops would want a good chance of being able to put him away if he did kill her. "

    lared wrote on Dec 4, 2008 1:21 PM:

    " Okay the time of death would answer the biggest question? Has that been confirmed. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that one, only a Coroner/Forsenic Pathogist. Was she dead before her husband went to work, has it been confirmed that he was in fact at work. If there were no fingerprints it's obvious gloves was used. "

    TO YEP wrote on Dec 4, 2008 12:39 PM:

    " No offense honey, but I know people and don't know names. I can see someone on the street and no them from a place of business or whatever and still not know their name. That doesn't mean I'm lying when I say I don't know so and so.
    Your story doesn't prove anything. "

    me wrote on Dec 4, 2008 10:10 AM:

    " Just a thought but did anyone from the sheriffs office ask Mr. Landry if he used gloves to take the ties from her neck because he should have left his DNA on it. "

    Justice for ALL wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:45 AM:

    " Just like in the O.J. Simpson case, I predict Mr. Landry will face a civil suit and will lose. Some justice must be served since the DA will never take this case to the Jury. No balls huh. "

    Yep wrote on Dec 4, 2008 7:34 AM:

    " The IPSO called my husband in for questioning, he didn't even know the woman but he did know the husband. Mr. Landry said he didn't know my husband, which was a lie since he saw him last week and waved at him...hmmm. My husband had to take a lie dectector test to prove he didn't know the woman, guess who led them to my husband...Mr. Landry. At the time I was having a allergic reaction to medicine thought I was going to have to go to the hospital, they threatened to arrest my husband if he didn't go right then. "

    Simply wrote on Dec 3, 2008 8:56 PM:

    " Inept....... thank goodness a man who wasn't guilty of anything, didn't get a railroad ticket. "

    erathdog wrote on Dec 3, 2008 6:16 PM:

    " Hmmm. I wonder what was the estimated time of death? They can usually tell by the temp of the body when it is found. Tie wraps? Very unusual way to commit suicide. Note zip ties, Plural. One is enough to do the deed, why was there two?
    ON the flip side, XANAX is the devils drug. Women will wack out if they over medicate with XANAX. I've seen it before. Xanax is poison on a bad mind. "

    OJ simpson wrote on Dec 3, 2008 3:05 PM:

    " Yeah, no doubt....Sounds like Mr. Landry did an OJ Simpson........ "

    Just Me wrote on Dec 3, 2008 2:46 PM:

    " It really is a shame that there are no answers in the case for any of the family members. People are pointing fingers and blaming each other for her death. I was hoping to hear more definite answers on this case. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

Please Note: Your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of good grammar, punctuation, etc. or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid. And note comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather

Weather Magnet