Bailout OK, but avoid repeat


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 2:10 PM CDT

WILL CHAPMAN
PUBLISHER

What’s caused the big financial crisis for our nation’s economy?

Certainly I won’t suggest I understand all of the factors and nuances that have caused the federal government to take over the nation’s two biggest mortgage companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and to now consider spending $700 billion to buy up bad mortgage loans to help other firms improve their books, and get back on a firm financial setting.

Advertisement
Although the various experts don’t all agree on the form of a bailout, it does appear most experts agree that some sort of bailout is needed.

Predictably, there are those trying to take political advantage of the Bush administration’s efforts to address the crisis.

“Why does the government bail out these big companies, the big shots and political cronies?” they say. “What about poor working class families who lose their homes when they can’t meet their obligations? Why no bailout for them?”

Clearly in a true free market economy, winners win and losers are allowed to lose.

While no one wants to see someone lose his home or face any other financial loss, those individual losses like losses suffered by the typical business, aren’t going to cause the widespread financial problems for the whole economy that are threatened should we allow Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or some of these huge insurance or investment companies to collapse.

Those who seek to paint the government’s efforts to prop up the economy as cronyism or fat-cat favoritism would presumably be the first to say the federal government must do something to save regular working people who saw their 401-K or other personal savings lose their value.

Patching up the big cracks in the dam, before they can spread or get even bigger, is the best way to keep the dam from collapsing and seeing us all get swept away in a flood of financial collapses.

Just proposing the bail out seems to have slowed down the negative financial announcements that were coming so fast in the days before the proposal was made.

Odds are whatever the final form of the bailout, it won’t be perfect.

But an imperfect plan that prevents an economic collapse is better than no plan that allows us to fall into an economic depression.

Of course, just as important as the plan to patch things up for now is to figure out what caused the current problems, and take steps to prevent this situation from happening again.

Comments

    Southern Fried Brain wrote on Sep 27, 2008 5:17 PM:

    " To ALL,
    The REAL problem was;
    1. Senators Barney Frank {D-MA} and Chris Dodd {D-CT} let this happen while they were in control of "banking and finance"!
    2. Obama {Oblahblah} was one of the TOP recipients of money!
    3. The "FED" should have STAYED abolished when Andrew Jackson shut it down nearly 2 centries ago!!

    "The Fed" had been "shot-down" MORE times than Captain J.S.McCain! Worse yet, WE are being held CAPTIVE by "them" NOW!

    Read your "Google" {history} books about it! "

    AC wrote on Sep 26, 2008 12:46 PM:

    " You forgot three zeros... you but 700,000,000 thats seven hundred million

    they are getting 700,000,000,000...seven hundred billion "

    hadenough wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:48 AM:

    " They thieves are all talking we must not reward bad behavior, so let's give them $700,000,000 of taxpayers' money We have already handed out 1.2 trillion. They said once they took over FRE, FNM all would be OK. They say it's a bad bill but will pass it anyway. They say it's not right but do it anyway. It's a shame, it's disgusting but they are doing it anyway. The calls to the politicians are running 200 to 300 to 1 against it but they are going to do it. I am 1 of the 300 "

    tothethieves wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:09 AM:

    " How many CEOs went to jail for back dating options. NONE Why cannot the taxpayers have a deal like Buffet? Preferred stock 10% interest, warrants to buy more a a set price. If it's good enough for private investor why isn't good enough for the taxpayer?If the companies need cash buy their stock not the worthless loans at inflated price. This is the same thing as the Iraq war. We must do it now based on false information. The thieves don't want to limit CEO pay,make to it harsh on the loans. Tough "

    disgusted wrote on Sep 25, 2008 8:31 AM:

    " Look at the record. These finacials gave millions to the politicians so they could be "self regulated". The politicians were warned in 2003 what was going to happen but the money kept flowing to them. Now they take our money and give it back. If these banks are to "big to fail" why did the politicans allow them to merge? Why give the money to people who created this mess? How is that going to help? This is corruption at its' finest. Americans will put the same ones in office to continue stealing from the middle class. "

    everyonehasone wrote on Sep 25, 2008 8:25 AM:

    " We are paying 4 departments to watch banks and investments none did so. This will do nothing to help people who could not afford a home loan to begin with. The "experts" are the politicians and CEOs who made this mess. The "experts" said all was fine 1 month ago. This is not the end, 2-3 trillion will be taken from the taxpayer so the"experts" can get the millions in bonuses. We are still going down. This is the biggest transfer of wealth in history. And they crooks are doing it in less than a week. Rememberwhattheysaid about Iraq "

    Vijay wrote on Sep 24, 2008 5:04 PM:

    " Why not use the $700 Bn to finance the homeowners in catching up with their defaulted mortgage payments? Of course, it needs to be ensured that the financial institutions rewrite those mortgages to something more sensible. This will at least keep the homeowners in their homes and allow them to continue the future payments. If the bail out merely puts cash back in the hands of the financial institutions who have so far thrown all caution to winds, it will only encourage reckless action on their part. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

• Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid.

• Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

• Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather