AGL foes' stance based on emotion

BY BRIAN LOCK
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:53 PM CDT

Like everyone else, I am affected by the crippling rise in prices of fossil fuels. It’s not just the cost of a tankful of gasoline that hurts; natural gas that many of us use for heating, hot water and cooking now costs double what it did just a few years ago. For that reason, I am glad to see any industry efforts to stabilize or reduce prices.  

AGL Resources currently stores natural gas in deep salt caverns beneath Lake Peigneur and provides it when demand is highest. There has been vocal opposition to AGL Resources and their plans to extend their operations.

I have extensive experience as a consultant on salt dome geology and the company asked me last year to evaluate the geological aspects of arguments being presented against the project. I reviewed a recording of a hearing before the state Legislature and have also watched a propaganda video compiled by the opposition group. A consistent theme is an emotional, rather than scientifically sound, appeal to the audience. The dimensions of the existing caverns are compared, for example, to the World Trade Center, rather than the Empire State Building or the Sears Tower. Not very subtle!

Advertisement
Most of the serious concerns of local residents are related to periodic bubbling and foaming seen at the lake in recent years. The fear is that this is caused by gas escaping from the storage caverns. When it is pointed out that the bubbling occurs over the flooded mine rather than over the storage caverns, complicated scenarios are presented to explain how gas could be escaping from the caverns through weak zones in the salt into the old mine before rising to the surface.

This is where my own experiences make me most critical of the arguments. I co-authored a technical paper some years ago in which I and Dr. Don Kupfer — the authority quoted most often by the opposition group — corrected the misused terminology concerning anomalous areas in salt encountered during underground mining. These anomalous areas or zones were being referred to as “shear zones,” which suggests cracks and fractures. In fact, these zones are composed of salt which commonly is harder to mine than normal salt. Rock salt has the property of quickly healing any fractures and indeed of closing in mine openings and drill holes at a surprising rate. This is why salt is essentially impermeable and is so highly regarded as a repository. No other common rock type is so well suited for this purpose, particularly in the form of domes, like the Gulf Coast occurrences.

So what is the cause of the bubbling at Lake Peigneur? The strongest clue is the association with the collapsed salt mine. At the time of the accident in 1980, I predicted that additional ground movements and salt dissolution could be expected for decades. Undoubtedly, pockets of air were trapped at the time and some of these may now be being released.

Additionally, some quantities of natural gas occur within salt and further dissolution by lake waters in the mine may be releasing small gas pockets. If the bubbles were of gas from the deep storage caverns, a steady stream would be expected, not the intermittent bubbling actually observed, and a loss of pressure in the storage units would be measured.

I could write at much greater length about the numerous natural disasters listed by the opposition group in their propaganda, but it is sufficient to say that none of their examples is appropriate to the deep storage caverns at Lake Peigneur. I am only surprised that they did not include the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Their arguments are based on emotion and lack geological credibility.

Brian Lock holds a Ph.D. in geology from the University of Cambridge (United Kingdom). He is the author of numerous technical articles, including a book on the history and geology of South Louisiana salt mining available through the Louisiana Geological Survey. He has consulted extensively on salt dome geology.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The following is a guest editorial written by Brian Lock, who over the last two years has provided technical expertise to the AGL on several occasions by reviewing reports and other documents related to salt domes.

Comments

    Marie wrote on May 25, 2008 11:54 AM:

    " Mr. Lock, were you compensated by AGL over the past 2 years?
    Also, the experts who testified on behalf of Lake Peigneur have credentials & are considered "experts".
    There are residents who have lived on the island for over 30 years, it's called "life experience", they have lived through the devastation of 1980. Will you take full responsibility if something happens with these storage caverns since you feel so obligated to the community? "

    lake resident wrote on May 25, 2008 5:51 AM:

    " I welcome any dredging, so that maybe we can use the lake for recreational boating, instead of waiting for high tide. I've watched the water during the first dredging operation and did not see much harm done. Let's not stop progress. AGL has been a good neighbor. "

    Brian Lock wrote on May 24, 2008 9:14 PM:

    " Response to Marie: I have lived in Acadiana for more than thirty years and have studied local salt dome geology for most of that time. I found the misinformation being presented by unqualified "experts" to be so misleading that I felt an obligation to share with the community the same information I gave AGL when they asked. "

    Dave wrote on May 24, 2008 8:53 PM:

    " Brian Lock, youmust not live by the lake either "

    drinkingwater wrote on May 24, 2008 10:55 AM:

    " The problem I have is using 3 million gallons of good water a day for 2 years. This is going to effect everyone in southern La. They are going to use all of this water at no cost to them, but the rest of us will have to pay when the "well" is dry. What studies have been done on this. From my understanding the water table is already dropping. "

    Marie wrote on May 23, 2008 11:41 PM:

    " In the Editor's Note it is stated that Mr. Lock has provided technical expertise to AGL on several occasions over the past 2 years. Mr. Lock were you compensated by AGL over the past 2 years? If so, I would say you are a little bias.
    Also, where do you reside?
    How dare you insult the experts who
    gave testimony!
    "

    Brian Lock wrote on May 23, 2008 6:13 PM:

    " Response to Dave: The biggest problem with the public discussion of the Lake Peigneur issue is the number of statements made by so-called experts who in fact have no expertise on the subjects they talk about. I don't want to do that! I do not know how much dredging is proposed, if any. Nor do I know how much contamination is present in the muds. I would suspect, however, that the Jefferson Mine event caused so much disturbance of the lake floor that dredging would be insignificant in comparison. "

    Dave wrote on May 22, 2008 11:38 PM:

    " Your words are quite convincing, but you should give comment as well to other problems that would be caused by AGL in the proposed exspansion. For instance the enviromental problem caused by dredging up the bottom in the orignal escavations. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment related to this story. Use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

•Comments must be approved by an editor or the publisher before appearing on the Web site but are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person supposedly posting an comment. Please consider this as you consider any statement made. A thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

• Please note your comments must attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation or they will not be posted. Do not use unfamiliar abbreviations or text-like short cuts, like ur for your. Please keep your tone civil. You can say someone's idea is stupid but you cannot say someone is stupid.

• Comments should deal with matters of public concern. Problems with private individuals or private companies are not likely to get posted.

• Questions or comments about items posted should be e-mailed to dailyiberian@bellsouth.net.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Classifieds


Contact Us

Subscribe
Vacation Hold
General Email

Mailing Address:
The Daily Iberian
P.O. Box 9290
New Iberia, LA
70562-9290

Street Address:
926 East Main St.
New Iberia, LA 70560

Phone:
(337) 365-6773

Fax:
(337)-367-9640

Inside Louisiana:
800-365-6773

Local Weather